ArticleThe journal of pain2016
Bedding Material Affects Mechanical Thresholds, Heat Thresholds, and Texture Preference.
Article in The journal of pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complex Substrates and Bedding for Environmental Enhancement and Research: Or, the Nature of Primates.American journal of primatology · 2026Review
- Beyond Comfort: A Review of the Critical Role of Bedding Selection in Rodent Welfare, Microenvironment, and Research Reproducibility.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Review
- Behavioral assessment of pain in rodents: advances from evoked responses to spontaneous states and multimodal approaches.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Astrocyte inhibition and PV interneuron activation: key mechanisms in electroacupuncture's effect on pain-anxiety comorbidity.Chinese medicine · 2025Article
- Simulated microgravity accurately models long-duration spaceflight effects on bone and skeletal muscle in skeletally immature mice.Bone reports · 2025Article
- Characterization of Reusable and Recyclable Plastic Bedding Materials for Laboratory Mice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- A Review of the Effects of Some Extrinsic Factors on Mice Used in Research.Comparative medicine · 2023Review
- Bedding as a variable affecting fasting blood glucose and vascular physiology in mice.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Article
- Innovations and advances in modelling and measuring pain in animals.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022Review
- Assessing Accumulation of Organic Material on Rodent Cage Accessories.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021Article
- Study logistics that can impact medical countermeasure efficacy testing in mouse models of radiation injury.International journal of radiation biology · 2021Article
- Comparative Effects of 1/4-inch and 1/8-inch Corncob Bedding on Cage Ammonia Levels, Behavior, and Respiratory Pathology of Male C57BL/6 and 129S1/Svlm Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020Article
- Article
- Optogenetic Inhibition of CGRPα Sensory Neurons Reveals Their Distinct Roles in Neuropathic and Incisional Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Article
- Laboratory environmental factors and pain behavior: the relevance of unknown unknowns to reproducibility and translation.Lab animal · 2017Article
- Pain-sensorimotor interactions: New perspectives and a new model.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledIt has long been known that the bedding type on which animals are housed can affect breeding behavior and cage environment, yet little is known about its effects on evoked behavior responses or nonreflexive behaviors. C57BL/6 mice were housed for 2 weeks on 1 of 5 bedding types: aspen Sani-Chips (standard bedding for our institute), ALPHA-Dri, Cellu-Dri, Pure-o'Cel, or TEK-Fresh. Mice housed on aspen exhibited the lowest (most sensitive) mechanical thresholds and those on TEK-Fresh exhibited 3-fold higher thresholds. Although bedding type had no effect on responses to punctate or dynamic light touch stimuli, TEK-Fresh-housed animals exhibited greater responsiveness in a noxious needle assay than did those housed on the other bedding types. Heat sensitivity was also affected by bedding because animals housed on aspen exhibited the shortest (most sensitive) latencies to withdrawal, whereas those housed on TEK-Fresh had the longest (least sensitive) latencies to response. Slight differences between bedding types were also seen in a moderate cold temperature preference assay. A modified tactile conditioned place preference chamber assay revealed that animals preferred TEK-Fresh to aspen bedding. Bedding type had no effect in a nonreflexive wheel running assay. In both acute (2 day) and chronic (5 week) inflammation induced by injection of complete Freund's adjuvant in the hindpaw, mechanical thresholds were reduced in all groups regardless of bedding type, but TEK-Fresh and Pure-o'Cel groups exhibited a greater dynamic range between controls and inflamed cohorts than aspen-housed mice. PERSPECTIVE: These findings indicate that the bedding type routinely used to house animals can markedly affect the dynamic range of mechanical and heat behavior assays under normal and tissue injury conditions. Among beddings tested, TEK-Fresh bedding resulted in the least sensitive baseline thresholds for mechanical and thermal stimuli and the greatest dynamic range after tissue injury. Therefore, selection of routine cage bedding material should be carefully considered for animals that will be tested in behavioral somatosensory assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.