Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26456752›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice2015

Clinical Signs and Diagnosis of the Canine Primary Glaucomas.

Paul E Miller, Ellison Bentley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Role of Inflammation in Canine Primary Glaucoma.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul E MillerDepartment of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2015 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1102, USA. Electronic address: millerp@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu.
Ellison BentleyDepartment of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2015 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1102, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW Vision Research Core - Administrative CoreP30EY016665 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROBERT W NICKELLS · 2005 to 2026
$12.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY016665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of glaucoma is highly dependent on a working understanding of the clinical signs and available diagnostic procedures. Clinical signs may be attributable to increased intraocular pressure and/or complex alterations in the physiology or molecular biology of the anterior segment, retinal ganglion cells, and optic nerve. Many diagnostic procedures seek to more fully characterize these alterations and to identify which clinical features increase the risk of overt primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) occurring. Considerable progress has been made in identifying the anatomic features that predispose an eye to PACG, and in elucidating the role of reverse pupillary block.

Indexed as

AnimalsDog DiseasesDogsGlaucomaCanineGlaucomaIntraocular pressureOcular imagingOptic neuropathyTonometry

Identifiers

PMID26456752
PMCPMC4862370
OpenAlexW1893028899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.