Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26456168›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2016

Hepatocellular carcinoma in Japanese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and alcoholic liver disease: multicenter survey.

Katsutoshi Tokushige, Hideyuki Hyogo, Tomoaki Nakajima, Masafumi Ono, Takumi Kawaguchi, Koichi Honda, Yuichiro Eguchi, Yuichi Nozaki, Miwa Kawanaka, Saiyu Tanaka and 27 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. [Characteristics and treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma caused by nonalcoholic fatty liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Katsutoshi TokushigeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan. ktoku@pg7.so-net.ne.jp.
Hideyuki HyogoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tomoaki NakajimaDepartment of Hepatology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masafumi OnoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan.
Takumi KawaguchiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koichi HondaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Yuichiro EguchiDivision of Hepatology, Liver Center, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
Yuichi NozakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Miwa KawanakaGeneral Internal Medicine 2, Kawasaki Hospital, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Saiyu TanakaCenter for Digestive and Liver Diseases, Nara City Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Kento ImajoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshio SumidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshihiro KamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hideki FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuaki SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nayoro City General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomomi KogisoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Yoshiyasu KarinoDepartment of Hepatology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kensuke MunekageDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan.
Ryoko KuromatsuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Satoshi OedaDivision of Hepatology, Liver Center, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
Mikio YanaseDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kohjiro MoriCenter for Digestive and Liver Diseases, Nara City Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Yuji OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuya SekoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tetsuo TakeharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshito ItohDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Atsushi NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kazuyuki KanemasaCenter for Digestive and Liver Diseases, Nara City Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Ken NishinoGeneral Internal Medicine 2, Kawasaki Hospital, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Naohiko MasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu TakahashiDivision of Hepatology, Liver Center, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
Masataka SeikeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Takuji TorimuraDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toshiji SaibaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan.
Joji ToyotaDepartment of Hepatology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kazuaki ChayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Etsuko HashimotoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Kochi Medical School Hospital · JPKurume University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNara City Hospital · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPSaga Medical School Hospital · JPSapporo Kosei General Hospital · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPYokohama City University · JPHiroshima University · JPKawasaki Medical School · JPOita University · JPOsaka University · JPNayoro City General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Japan, the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with nonviral liver disease, especially with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD-HCC) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD-HCC), has been increasing. Clarification of the clinical features of NAFLD-HCC and ALD-HCC is needed. We performed a large retrospective multicenter survey to clarify the clinical course of these two types of HCC.

methodsClinical characteristics, survival, and recurrence were examined in 532 patients with ALD-HCC and 209 patients with NAFLD-HCC who were diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2013.

resultsThe ALD-HCC patients were predominantly male and were younger than the patients with NAFLD-HCC. Lifestyle-related diseases were significantly more common in the NAFLD-HCC group, but the prevalence of cirrhosis was significantly higher in the ALD-HCC group. The histological diagnosis of NAFLD-HCC showed a gender difference (F4; 72.7 % in the females vs. 37.6 % in the males). The characteristic features of HCC including histology, survival rate, and recurrence rate were quite similar in the NAFLD-HCC and ALD-HCC groups: 5-year survival rates 49.1 vs. 43.7 %; 5-year recurrence rates 69.6 vs. 65.4 %, respectively. However, the risk factors for recurrence differed between the two groups: des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin was a risk factor in NAFLD-HCC and α-fetoprotein was a risk factor in ALD-HCC.

conclusionsAlthough the characteristic features underlying these two diseases are different, the two HCC groups showed a similar clinical course. The recurrence rates of the two HCC groups were relatively high. We found that critical tumor markers for recurrence differed between the two diseases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHumansJapanLiver Diseases, AlcoholicLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateAlcoholic liver diseaseHepatocellular carcinomaNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseRecurrenceSurvival

Identifiers

PMID26456168
OpenAlexW1923546548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.