Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26455902›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Dual mode of action of Bt proteins: protoxin efficacy against resistant insects.

Bruce E Tabashnik, Min Zhang, Jeffrey A Fabrick, Yidong Wu, Meijing Gao, Fangneng Huang, Jizhen Wei, Jie Zhang, Alexander Yelich, Gopalan C Unnithan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Potential Role of the Methionine Aminopeptidase GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bruce E TabashnikDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Min ZhangDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Jeffrey A FabrickU.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ 85138, USA.
Yidong WuDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Meijing GaoDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Fangneng HuangDepartment of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Jizhen WeiDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Jie ZhangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100026, China.
Alexander YelichDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Gopalan C UnnithanDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Alejandra BravoInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca 62250, Morelos, Mexico.
Mario SoberónInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca 62250, Morelos, Mexico.
Yves CarrièreDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Xianchun LiDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) proteins for pest control are grown extensively, but insect adaptation can reduce their effectiveness. Established mode of action models assert that Bt proteins Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac are produced as inactive protoxins that require conversion to a smaller activated form to exert toxicity. However, contrary to this widely accepted paradigm, we report evidence from seven resistant strains of three major crop pests showing that Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac protoxins were generally more potent than the corresponding activated toxins. Moreover, resistance was higher to activated toxins than protoxins in eight of nine cases evaluated in this study. These data and previously reported results support a new model in which protoxins and activated toxins kill insects via different pathways. Recognizing that protoxins can be more potent than activated toxins against resistant insects may help to enhance and sustain the efficacy of transgenic Bt crops.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsCrops, AgriculturalEndotoxinsGene ExpressionHemolysin ProteinsInsect ProteinsIntestinal MucosaIntestinesLarvaLepidopteraModels, MolecularPlants, Genetically ModifiedProtein BindingBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsHemolysin Proteinsinsecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus ThuringiensisInsect ProteinsProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID26455902
PMCPMC4601037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.