Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26455774›Full record

ReviewTrends in ecology & evolution2015

Open Questions on the Origin of Eukaryotes.

Purificación López-García, David Moreira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in ecology & evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Energetics and evolution: Response to Martin.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Bioenergetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The cell biology and genome ofMolecular biology of the cell · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. On the origin of the nucleus: a hypothesis.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of factors shaping the endoplasmic reticulum.Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Why sequence all eukaryotes?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Purificación López-GarcíaUnité d'Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris-Sud/Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, 91405 Orsay, France. Electronic address: puri.lopez@u-psud.fr.
David MoreiraUnité d'Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris-Sud/Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, 91405 Orsay, France.

Funding

European Research Council 322669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent progress, the origin of the eukaryotic cell remains enigmatic. It is now known that the last eukaryotic common ancestor was complex and that endosymbiosis played a crucial role in eukaryogenesis at least via the acquisition of the alphaproteobacterial ancestor of mitochondria. However, the nature of the mitochondrial host is controversial, although the recent discovery of an archaeal lineage phylogenetically close to eukaryotes reinforces models proposing archaea-derived hosts. We argue that, in addition to improved phylogenomic analyses with more comprehensive taxon sampling to pinpoint the closest prokaryotic relatives of eukaryotes, determining plausible mechanisms and selective forces at the origin of key eukaryotic features, such as the nucleus or the bacterial-like eukaryotic membrane system, is essential to constrain existing models.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhylogenyArchaeaEukaryotaEukaryotic CellsMitochondriaSymbiosisarchaeaeukaryogenesismembranemetabolismorigin of nucleussymbiosissyntrophy

Identifiers

PMID26455774
PMCPMC4640172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.