Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26455641›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular endocrinology2015

Endocrine resistance in breast cancer--An overview and update.

Robert Clarke, John J Tyson, J Michael Dixon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular endocrinology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 211 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
211citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

211 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 351 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Regulation of PSAT1 and PHGDH by m6A in endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2026
    Article
  8. Targeting Estrogen Receptor for Breast Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Targeting Glutaminase Isoforms GLS and GLS2 in Luminal Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

151 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert ClarkeDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC 20057, USA. Electronic address: clarker@georgetown.edu.
John J TysonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
J Michael DixonEdinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Georgetown University · USVirginia Tech · USWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Novel Targets in Endocrine ResponsivenessU54CA149147 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MADHAVAN, SUBHA · 2010 to 2014
$6.9M
Collaborative Research in Integrative Cancer BiologyU01CA184902 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI CLARKE, ROBERT R., WANG, YUE · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30-CA51008NCI NIH HHS U01 CA184902NCI NIH HHS U01-CA184902NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149147NCI NIH HHS U54-CA149147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumors that express detectable levels of the product of the ESR1 gene (estrogen receptor-α; ERα) represent the single largest molecular subtype of breast cancer. More women eventually die from ERα+ breast cancer than from either HER2+ disease (almost half of which also express ERα) and/or from triple negative breast cancer (ERα-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, and HER2-negative). Antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitors are largely indistinguishable from each other in their abilities to improve overall survival and almost 50% of ERα+ breast cancers will eventually fail one or more of these endocrine interventions. The precise reasons why these therapies fail in ERα+ breast cancer remain largely unknown. Pharmacogenetic explanations for Tamoxifen resistance are controversial. The role of ERα mutations in endocrine resistance remains unclear. Targeting the growth factors and oncogenes most strongly correlated with endocrine resistance has proven mostly disappointing in their abilities to improve overall survival substantially, particularly in the metastatic setting. Nonetheless, there are new concepts in endocrine resistance that integrate molecular signaling, cellular metabolism, and stress responses including endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) that provide novel insights and suggest innovative therapeutic targets. Encouraging evidence that drug combinations with CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors can extend recurrence free survival may yet translate to improvements in overall survival. Whether the improvements seen with immunotherapy in other cancers can be achieved in breast cancer remains to be determined, particularly for ERα+ breast cancers. This review explores the basic mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapies, concluding with some new insights from systems biology approaches further implicating autophagy and the UPR in detail, and a brief discussion of exciting new avenues and future prospects.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmEndoplasmic Reticulum StressUnfolded Protein ResponseAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsFemaleHumansMutationAromatase InhibitorsESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsAntiestrogensAutophagyBreast cancerComputational biologyEndocrine resistanceSystems biologyTamoxifenUnfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID26455641
PMCPMC4684757
OpenAlexW1917948530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.