Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26455446›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2015

The role of trade and investment liberalization in the sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages market: a natural experiment contrasting Vietnam and the Philippines.

Ashley Schram, Ronald Labonte, Phillip Baker, Sharon Friel, Aaron Reeves, David Stuckler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ashley SchramSchool of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine, University of Ottawa, 850 Peter Morand Crescent, K1G 5Z3, Ottawa, Canada. agrau012@uottawa.ca.
Ronald LabonteSchool of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine, University of Ottawa, 850 Peter Morand Crescent, K1G 5Z3, Ottawa, Canada. rlabonte@uottawa.ca.
Phillip BakerRegulatory Institutions Network (RegNet), Australian National University, H.C. Coombs Extension Building #8, Fellows Road, ACT 0200, Canberra, Australia. phillip.baker@anu.edu.au.
Sharon FrielRegulatory Institutions Network (RegNet), Australian National University, H.C. Coombs Extension Building #8, Fellows Road, ACT 0200, Canberra, Australia. Sharon.Friel@anu.edu.au.
Aaron ReevesDepartment of Sociology, University of Oxford, Manor Road Building, Manor Road, OX1 3UQ, Oxford, UK. aaron.reeves@sociology.ox.ac.uk.
David StucklerDepartment of Sociology, University of Oxford, Manor Road Building, Manor Road, OX1 3UQ, Oxford, UK. david.stuckler@chch.ox.ac.uk.
Australian National University · AUUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

CIHRWellcome Trust 100709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrade and investment liberalization may facilitate the spread of sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages (SSCBs), products associated with increased risk factors for obesity, type II diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases (Circulation 121:1356-1364, 2010). Apart from a limited set of comparative cross-national studies, the majority of analyses linking liberalization and the food environment have drawn on case studies and descriptive accounts. The current failure of many countries to reverse the obesity epidemic calls for investigation into both individual and systemic factors, including trade and investment policies.

methodsUsing a natural experimental design we tested whether Vietnam's removal of restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) subsequent to its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2007 increased sales of SSCBs compared with a matched country, the Philippines, which acceded in 1995. Difference-in-difference (DID) models were used to test pre/post differences in total SSCB sales and foreign company penetration covering the years 1999-2013.

resultsFollowing Vietnam's removal of restrictions on FDI, the growth rate of SSCB sales increased to 12.1 % per capita per year from a prior growth rate of 3.3 %. SSCB sales per capita rose significantly faster pre- and post-intervention in Vietnam compared with the control country the Philippines (DID: 4.6 L per annum, 95 % CI: 3.8 to 5.4 L, p < 0.008). Vietnam's increase in SSCBs was primarily attributable to products manufactured by foreign companies, whose annual sales growth rates rose from 6.7 to 23.1 %, again unmatched within the Philippines over this period (DID: 12.3 %, 95 % CI: 8.6 to 16.0 %, p < 0.049).

conclusionsGrowth of SSCB sales in Vietnam, led by foreign-owned companies, significantly accelerated after trade and investment liberalization.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorPoliticsCarbonated BeveragesCommerceDeveloping CountriesHumansInvestmentsPhilippinesSweetening AgentsVietnamSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID26455446
PMCPMC4601146
OpenAlexW2142021532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.