Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26455308›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015

Allorecognition proteins in an invertebrate exhibit homophilic interactions.

Uma B Karadge, Minja Gosto, Matthew L Nicotra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Making Neurobots and Chimerical Ctenophores.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A family of unusual immunoglobulin superfamily genes in an invertebrate histocompatibility complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Gene Manipulation in Hydractinia.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The colonial cnidarianEvoDevo · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Self-identity reprogrammed by a single residue switch in a cell surface receptor of a social bacterium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Uma B KaradgeDepartment of Surgery and the Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Minja GostoDepartment of Surgery and the Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Matthew L NicotraDepartment of Surgery and the Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. Electronic address: nicotraml@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training in Transplantation BiologyT32AI074490 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Angus W Thomson · 2007 to 2026
$4.2M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI074490NIAID NIH HHS T32AI074490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sessile colonial invertebrates-animals such as sponges, corals, bryozoans, and ascidians-can distinguish between their own tissues and those of conspecifics upon contact [1]. This ability, called allorecognition, mediates spatial competition and can prevent stem cell parasitism by ensuring that colonies only fuse with self or close kin. In every taxon studied to date, allorecognition is controlled by one or more highly polymorphic genes [2-8]. However, in no case is it understood how the proteins encoded by these genes discriminate self from non-self. In the cnidarian Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus, allorecognition is controlled by at least two highly polymorphic allorecognition genes, Alr1 and Alr2 [3, 5, 9-12]. Sequence variation at each gene predicts allorecognition in laboratory strains such that colonies reject if they do not share a common allele at either locus, fuse temporarily if they share an allele at only one locus, or fuse permanently if they share an allele at both genes [5, 9]. Here, we show that the gene products of Alr1 and Alr2 (Alr1 and Alr2) are self-ligands with extraordinary specificity. Using an in vitro cell aggregation assay, we found that Alr1 and Alr2 bind to themselves homophilically across opposing cell membranes. For both proteins, each isoform bound only to itself or to an isoform of nearly identical sequence. These results provide a mechanistic explanation for the exquisite specificity of Hydractinia allorecognition. Our results also indicate that hydroids have evolved a molecular strategy of self-recognition that is unique among characterized allorecognition systems within and outside invertebrates.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsAutoantigensCHO CellsCricetulusGenetic VariationHydrozoaProteinsUrochordataAutoantigensProteins

Identifiers

PMID26455308
PMCPMC4631698
OpenAlexW1831573959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.