ArticleBiochimie2016
Peptidase specificity from the substrate cleavage collection in the MEROPS database and a tool to measure cleavage site conservation.
Article in Biochimie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel endopeptidase overcoming lysostaphin resistance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Proteolytic and non-proteolytic mechanisms of keratin degradation inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Functional proteomic analysis of Streptomyces sp. F-3 reveals its potential to effectively degrade waste-yeast.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- An atlas of caspase cleavage events in differentiating muscle cells.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- The parasitic lifestyle of an archaeal symbiont.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Application of N-Terminal Labeling Methods Provide Novel Insights into Endoproteolysis of the Prion ProteinACS chemical neuroscience · 2024Article
- Genomic Insights into the Distribution of Peptidases and Proteolytic Capacity amongMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Characterization of a Stable Form of Carboxypeptidase G2 (Glucarpidase), a Potential Biobetter Variant, From Acinetobacter sp. 263903-1.Molecular biotechnology · 2021Article
- Article
- Borrelia burgdorferi infection modifies protein content in saliva of Ixodes scapularis nymphs.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- The Tumor Proteolytic Landscape: A Challenging Frontier in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- How to use the MEROPS database and website to help understand peptidase specificity.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- A highly efficient protein degradation system in Bacillus sp. CN2: a functional-degradomics study.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Does Cysteine Rule (CysR) Complete the CendR Principle? Increase in Affinity of Peptide Ligands for NRP-1 Through the Presence of N-Terminal Cysteine.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Microbial Keratinase: Next Generation Green Catalyst and Prospective Applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Bioinformatic Analysis of the Wound Peptidome Reveals Potential Biomarkers and Antimicrobial Peptides.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Emergence of the Ug99 lineage of the wheat stem rust pathogen through somatic hybridisation.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Potential MMP2-mediated availability of HLA binding, mutant ECM peptides reflects better melanoma survival rates and greater T-cell infiltrates.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2019Article
- Bacteroidetes use thousands of enzyme combinations to break down glycans.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One peptidase can usually be distinguished from another biochemically by its action on proteins, peptides and synthetic substrates. Since 1996, the MEROPS database (http://merops.sanger.ac.uk) has accumulated a collection of cleavages in substrates that now amounts to 66,615 cleavages. The total number of peptidases for which at least one cleavage is known is 1700 out of a total of 2457 different peptidases. This paper describes how the cleavages are obtained from the scientific literature, how they are annotated and how cleavages in peptides and proteins are cross-referenced to entries in the UniProt protein sequence database. The specificity profiles of 556 peptidases are shown for which ten or more substrate cleavages are known. However, it has been proposed that at least 40 cleavages in disparate proteins are required for specificity analysis to be meaningful, and only 163 peptidases (6.6%) fulfil this criterion. Also described are the various displays shown on the website to aid with the understanding of peptidase specificity, which are derived from the substrate cleavage collection. These displays include a logo, distribution matrix, and tables to summarize which amino acids or groups of amino acids are acceptable (or not acceptable) in each substrate binding pocket. For each protein substrate, there is a display to show how it is processed and degraded. Also described are tools on the website to help with the assessment of the physiological relevance of cleavages in a substrate. These tools rely on the hypothesis that a cleavage site that is conserved in orthologues is likely to be physiologically relevant, and alignments of substrate protein sequences are made utilizing the UniRef50 database, in which in each entry sequences are 50% or more identical. Conservation in this case means substitutions are permitted only if the amino acid is known to occupy the same substrate binding pocket from at least one other substrate cleaved by the same peptidase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.