Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2016
An evaluation of two heavier-than-water internal limiting membrane-specific dyes during macular hole surgery.
Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomised controlled trial evaluating internal limiting membrane peeling forceps in macular hole surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Trial
- Spotlight on the Internal Limiting Membrane Technique for Macular Holes: Current Perspectives.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Evaluation of efficacy and safety of new high-density dyes for chromovitrectomy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Assessment of Macular Function Following Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling With ILM Blue®.Cureus · 2020Article
- Intraocular use of acid violet 17 at a concentration of 1.5 mg/ml is not safe.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017Article
- Letter in response to letter: intraocular use of acid violet 17 at a concentration of 1.5 mg/ml is not safe : By Professor Heinrich Gerding, Department of Ophthalmology, Pallas Kliniken.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017Article
- Optimal management of idiopathic macular holes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the staining characteristics and effect on internal limiting membrane (ILM) histology of two heavier-than-water ILM-specific dyes during macular hole surgery: acid violet 17 combined with 5 % mannitol (AV17-M) and brilliant blue G with 4 % polyethylene glycol (BBG-P).
methodsSingle-centre observational comparative cohort study. The ILM of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for idiopathic macular hole were stained with BBG-P and AV17-M for 10 s each. The ILMs were retrieved and examined with electron microscopy. The extent of retinal and vitreous side debris was scored. Surgical videos were used to assess the staining contrast effect by measuring the Euclidean distance in the CIELAB colour space between stained and unstained retinas after peeling.
results51 consecutive patients were studied with 25 in the AV17-M group and 26 in the BBG-P group. The mean age was 71 years with no significant difference between the groups. The amount of retinal side tissue was greater on the BBG-P-stained ILMs compared to the AV17-M-stained ILMs (30.2 versus 19.6 %, p < 0.001). There was a difference in the CIELAB colour space separation distance between stained and peeled retinas (5.89 versus 3.97, p = 0.01) in favour of BBG-P. Visual outcomes between the two groups were similar (logMAR visual acuity 0.40 versus 0.38, p = 0.74).
conclusionBoth stains were successfully used to peel the ILM with comparable outcomes. AV17-M resulted in less retinal debris than BBG-P, suggesting an altered and potentially beneficial ILM cleavage plane from the retina but with lowered staining contrast than BBG-PEG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.