ArticleMolecular neurobiology2016
Levetiracetam Prevents Perforin Mediated Neuronal Injury Induced by Acute Cerebral Ischemia Reperfusion.
Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early preclinical plasma protein biomarkers of brain trauma are influenced by early seizures and levetiracetam.Epilepsia open · 2023Article
- Levetiracetam Attenuates the Spinal Cord Injury Induced by Acute Trauma via Suppressing the Expression of Perforin.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Neuroprotective and Angiogenesis Effects of Levetiracetam Following Ischemic Stroke in Rats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the neuroprotection mechanism of levetiracetam (LEV) with acute focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/P) mouse. The cerebral artery I/P animal model was prepared with a middle artery cerebral occlusion method. For drug intervention, mice were intraperitoneally injected with LEV with a dose of either 15 or 150 mg/kg. Neuronal injury was evaluated by measuring the infarct area, apoptosis ratio, and observation of blood-brain barrier ultrastructure with transmission electron microscope. CD8(+) antibody and perforin antibody were used to make cross-reference screen through flow cytometry to determine a perforin-positive rate in CD8(+) T lymphocytes (PFN + %). Injection of LEV can reduce infarct area, apoptosis ratio, and blood-brain barrier damage 24 h later after acute I/P in WT mice. In vitro, perforin can lower hippocampal neuron viability. In vivo, removing perforin can relieve neuronal injury. High dose injection of LEV (150 mg/kg) can inhibit perforin secreting from CD8(+)T lymphocytes. In addition, LEV can still protect neurons with perforin knockout mice. Therefore, our results suggested that LEV may contribute to neuron protection after cerebral ischemia reperfusion. The possible mechanism may be related with perforin release. However, we cannot roll out other mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.