Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26454680›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2016

A Multidisciplinary Orbit-Sparing Treatment Approach That Includes Proton Therapy for Epithelial Tumors of the Orbit and Ocular Adnexa.

Emma B Holliday, Bita Esmaeli, Jamie Pinckard, Adam S Garden, David I Rosenthal, William H Morrison, Merrill S Kies, G Brandon Gunn, C David Fuller, Jack Phan and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Proton Beam Therapy in the Treatment of Periorbital Malignancies.International journal of particle therapy · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma B HollidayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Bita EsmaeliOrbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Program, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jamie PinckardSchool of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Adam S GardenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
David I RosenthalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
William H MorrisonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Merrill S KiesDepartment of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
G Brandon GunnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
C David FullerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jack PhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Beth M BeadleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Xiarong Ronald ZhuDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Steven J FrankDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: sjfrank@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kathrin Milbury · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative radiation is often indicated in the treatment of malignant epithelial tumors of the orbit and ocular adnexa. We present details of radiation technique and toxicity data after orbit-sparing surgery followed by adjuvant proton radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients underwent orbit-sparing surgery followed by proton therapy for newly diagnosed malignant epithelial tumors of the lacrimal gland (n=7), lacrimal sac/nasolacrimal duct (n=10), or eyelid (n=3). Tumor characteristics, treatment details, and visual outcomes were obtained from medical records. Acute and chronic toxicity were prospectively scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

resultsThe median radiation dose was 60 Gy(RBE) (relative biological effectiveness; [range 50-70 Gy]); 11 patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Dose to ipsilateral anterior optic structures was reduced in 13 patients by having them gaze away from the target during treatment. At a median follow-up time of 27.1 months (range 2.6-77.2 months), no patient had experienced local recurrence; 1 had regional and 1 had distant recurrence. Three patients developed chronic grade 3 epiphora, and 3 developed grade 3 exposure keratopathy. Four patients experienced a decrease in visual acuity from baseline but maintained vision sufficient to perform all activities of daily living without difficulty. Patients with grade ≥3 chronic ocular toxicity had higher maximum dose to the ipsilateral cornea (median 46.3 Gy[RBE], range 36.6-52.7 Gy[RBE] vs median 37.4 Gy[RBE], range 9.0-47.3 Gy(RBE); P=.017).

conclusionsOrbit-sparing surgery for epithelial tumors of the orbit and ocular adnexa followed by proton therapy successfully achieved disease control and was well tolerated. No patient required orbital exenteration or enucleation. Chronic grade 3 toxicity was associated with high maximum dose to the cornea. An eye-deviation technique can be used to limit the maximum corneal dose to <35 Gy(RBE).

Indexed as

OrbitOrgans at RiskAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinomaCarcinoma, Adenoid CysticCarcinoma, Squamous CellCorneaEyelid NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLacrimal ApparatusMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26454680
PMCPMC9627579
OpenAlexW1153690219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.