ArticleJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2016
Slowing of contractile kinetics by myosin-binding protein C can be explained by its cooperative binding to the thin filament.
Article in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human atrial skinned muscle fibers exhibit reduced length-dependent activation but show faster force development kinetics than ventricular muscle.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2026Article
- Autoinhibition of cMyBP-C by its middle domains.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2025Article
- In defense of Huxley.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- MyBP-C: one protein to govern them all.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac myosin binding protein C (cMyBP-C) is a thick filament-associated protein that participates in the regulation of muscle contraction. Simplified in vitro systems show that cMyBP-C binds not only to myosin, but also to the actin filament. The physiological significance of these separate binding interactions remains unclear, as does the question of whether either interaction is capable of explaining the behavior of intact muscle from which cMyBP-C has been removed. We have used a computational model to explore the characteristic effects of myosin-binding versus actin-binding by cMyBP-C. Simulations suggest that myosin-cMyBP-C interactions reduce peak force and Ca2 + sensitivity of the myofilaments, but have no appreciable effect on the rate of force redevelopment (ktr). In contrast, cMyBP-C binding to actin increases myofilament Ca2 + sensitivity and slows ktrat sub-maximal Ca2 + values. This slowing is due to cooperation between cMyBP-C ‘crossbridges’ and traditional myosin crossbridges as they bind to and activate the actin thin filament. We further observed that an overall recapitulation of skinned myocardial data from wild type and cMyBP-C knockout mice requires the interaction of cMyBP-C with of both of its binding targets in our model. The assumption of significant interactions with both partners was also sufficient to explain published effects of cMyBP-C ablation on twitch kinetics. These modeling results strongly support the view that both binding interactions play critical roles in the physiology of intact muscle. Furthermore, they suggest that the widely observed phenomenon of slowed force development in the presence of cMyBP-C may actually be a manifestation of cooperative binding of this protein to the thin filament.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.