Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26454014›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

The Genome and Methylome of a Beetle with Complex Social Behavior, Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae).

Christopher B Cunningham, Lexiang Ji, R Axel W Wiberg, Jennifer Shelton, Elizabeth C McKinney, Darren J Parker, Richard B Meagher, Kyle M Benowitz, Eileen M Roy-Zokan, Michael G Ritchie and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Updated Genome of the Burying BeetleEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher B CunninghamDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia cbc83@uga.edu ajmoore@uga.edu.
Lexiang JiInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia.
R Axel W WibergCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
Jennifer SheltonDivision of Biology & Bioinformatics Center & Arthropod Genomics Center, Kansas State University.
Elizabeth C McKinneyDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia.
Darren J ParkerCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
Richard B MeagherDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia.
Kyle M BenowitzDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia.
Eileen M Roy-ZokanDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia.
Michael G RitchieCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
Susan J BrownDivision of Biology & Bioinformatics Center & Arthropod Genomics Center, Kansas State University.
Robert J SchmitzDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia.
Allen J MooreDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia cbc83@uga.edu ajmoore@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · USUniversity of St Andrews · GBKansas State University · US

Funding

NUCLEAR CAPTURE FOR CELL-TYPE SPECIFIC EPIGENETIC ANALYSIS OF ADIPOCYTESR01DK100392 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MEAGHER, RICHARD BRIAN, SMITH, ALICIA K · 2014 to 2015
$670k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testing for conserved and novel mechanisms underlying phenotypic evolution requires a diversity of genomes available for comparison spanning multiple independent lineages. For example, complex social behavior in insects has been investigated primarily with eusocial lineages, nearly all of which are Hymenoptera. If conserved genomic influences on sociality do exist, we need data from a wider range of taxa that also vary in their levels of sociality. Here, we present the assembled and annotated genome of the subsocial beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides, a species long used to investigate evolutionary questions of complex social behavior. We used this genome to address two questions. First, do aspects of life history, such as using a carcass to breed, predict overlap in gene models more strongly than phylogeny? We found that the overlap in gene models was similar between N. vespilloides and all other insect groups regardless of life history. Second, like other insects with highly developed social behavior but unlike other beetles, does N. vespilloides have DNA methylation? We found strong evidence for an active DNA methylation system. The distribution of methylation was similar to other insects with exons having the most methylated CpGs. Methylation status appears highly conserved; 85% of the methylated genes in N. vespilloides are also methylated in the hymentopteran Nasonia vitripennis. The addition of this genome adds a coleopteran resource to answer questions about the evolution and mechanistic basis of sociality and to address questions about the potential role of methylation in social behavior.

Indexed as

Consummatory BehaviorDNA MethylationGenome, InsectAnimalsColeopteraEvolution, MolecularSocial Behaviorburying beetleepigeneticsparental caresociality

Identifiers

PMID26454014
PMCPMC4700941
OpenAlexW2211882453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.