Observational studyJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2015
Anemia and its association with clinical outcome in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Observational study in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Interplay of Comorbidities in Chronic Heart Failure: Challenges and Solutions.Current cardiology reviews · 2024Review
- Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventriculo-arterial Coupling: Clinical Correlates and Prognostic Impact in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
- Prediction of clinical outcome in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - the role of NT-ProBNP and a combined response score.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough a substantial proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) have anemia, there is a paucity of data evaluating the impact of anemia on clinical outcome in CRT patients. Our goal was to examine the ability of baseline hemoglobin (Hb) level and change in Hb level over time to predict clinical 2-year outcome and echocardiographic response to CRT.
methodsThree hundred consecutive CRT patients (median 72 years [interquartile range (IQR) 16 years], 19% female) with baseline and follow-up hematological profiles available were examined. Baseline anemia was defined as Hb <12 g/dL in women and <13 g/dL in men, and patients were grouped into equal quartiles based on change in Hb. Two-year clinical outcome was determined using a composite endpoint that included HF hospitalization, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement, heart transplantation, and all-cause mortality. Echocardiographic reverse remodeling was examined at 6-month follow-up.
resultsOne hundred fifty-one anemic patients were compared to 149 non-anemic patients. Changes in left ventricular dimensions and ejection fraction were similar for both groups. Univariate predictors of 2-year clinical outcome included baseline creatinine level, diuretic usage, and anemia; in multivariable regression, baseline anemia was an independent predictor for outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.22-2.63], p = 0.003). The quartile with the most negative change in Hb concentration over time (≤-1.00 g/dL) had poorer event-free 2-year survival (HR 1.84, CI [1.13-3.00], p = 0.014).
conclusionsBaseline anemia and early postimplantation decline in Hb levels are associated with a worse 2-year prognosis in CRT patients, even though the magnitude of left ventricular reverse remodeling is similar compared to non-anemic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26453528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.