ReviewBone2015
Bone and muscle: Interactions beyond mechanical.
Review in Bone, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 187 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
187 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Research hotspots and trends of sarcopenia in orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2023.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Identification of pleiotropic loci underlying hip bone mineral density and trunk lean mass.Journal of human genetics · 2021Pooled it
- The effect of exercise training on osteocalcin, adipocytokines, and insulin resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021Pooled it
- Relationship between the Mediterranean dietary pattern and musculoskeletal health in children, adolescents, and adults: systematic review and evidence map.Nutrition reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Does Zoledronic Acid Improve Appendicular Lean Mass in Older Women with Osteoporosis? A Sub-Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2022Trial
- Prevalence, risk factors and adverse health outcomes of osteosarcopenia in middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus-a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Review
- Anti-osteoporotic Pharmacotherapy and Muscle Outcomes in Osteosarcopenia: a Source-Verified Translational Evidence Map.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- Age-dependent musculoskeletal changes during mechanical unloading with bisphosphonate treatment.Bone · 2026Article
- The relationship between circulating osteocalcin and muscle mass measurements in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Sports medicine and health science · 2026Review
- Persistent postnatal IGF2 expression alters adult skeletal architecture inBone reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Vesicular Communication in the Bone-Muscle Unit: Physiological Functions, Aging, and Therapeutic Potential.Cells · 2026Review
- Cloud-Enabled Automated CT Assessment of Pelvic Muscle Quality in Women With and Without Low-Energy Femoral Neck Fracture.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Observational
- Sex specific effects of irisin on the skeleton.Bone research · 2026Review
- Aging-Related Muscle Bmal1 Decline Contributes to Bone Loss in Mice via Enhancing IL-1α-Mediated Osteoclastogenesis.Aging cell · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal degeneration and cardiovascular aging: a narrative review of shared mechanobiological pathways.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Coordinated Bone-Muscle Axis Association in South China Carp (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The musculoskeletal system is significantly more complex than portrayed by traditional reductionist approaches that have focused on and studied the components of this system separately. While bone and skeletal muscle are the two largest tissues within this system, this system also includes tendons, ligaments, cartilage, joints and other connective tissues along with vascular and nervous tissues. Because the main function of this system is locomotion, the mechanical interaction among the major players of this system is essential for the many shapes and forms observed in vertebrates and even in invertebrates. Thus, it is logical that the mechanical coupling theories of musculoskeletal development exert a dominant influence on our understanding of the biology of the musculoskeletal system, because these relationships are relatively easy to observe, measure, and perturb. Certainly much less recognized is the molecular and biochemical interaction among the individual players of the musculoskeletal system. In this brief review article, we first introduce some of the key reasons why the mechanical coupling theory has dominated our view of bone-muscle interactions followed by summarizing evidence for the secretory nature of bones and muscles. Finally, a number of highly physiological questions that cannot be answered by the mechanical theories alone will be raised along with different lines of evidence that support both a genetic and a biochemical communication between bones and muscles. It is hoped that these discussions will stimulate new insights into this fertile and promising new way of defining the relationships between these closely related tissues. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for biochemical communication between bone and muscle is important not only from a basic research perspective but also as a means to identify potential new therapies for bone and muscle diseases, especially for when they co-exist. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Muscle Bone Interactions".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.