Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26453452›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2015

Pain intensity, neck pain and longer duration of complaints predict poorer outcome in patients with shoulder pain--a systematic review.

Margit K Kooijman, Di-Janne A Barten, Ilse C S Swinkels, Ton Kuijpers, Dinny de Bakker, Bart W Koes, Cindy Veenhof

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Influence of pain duration on pain outcomes following palliative radiotherapy for painful tumors: the sooner the irradiation, the better?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Margit K KooijmanNIVEL Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands. margitkooijman@outlook.com.
Di-Janne A BartenNIVEL Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands. d.barten@nivel.nl.
Ilse C S SwinkelsNIVEL Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands. i.swinkels@nivel.nl.
Ton KuijpersDutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands. t.kuijpers@nhg.org.
Dinny de BakkerNIVEL Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands. d.debakker@nivel.nl.
Bart W KoesErasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. b.koes@erasmusmc.nl.
Cindy VeenhofUniversity Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.veenhof-2@umcutrecht.nl.
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLDutch College of General Practitioners · NLErasmus MC · NLTilburg University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShoulder complaints are common and have an unfavourable prognosis in many patients. Prognostic information is helpful for both patients and clinicians in managing the complaints. The research question was which factors have prognostic value on (un)favourable outcome in patients with shoulder complaints in primary care, secondary care and occupational settings.

methodsUpdate of a systematic review in primary care, secondary care and occupational settings.

resultsNine articles were published since the original review in 2004. Six were of high quality covering a wide variety of prognostic factors and outcome measures. Four studies were conducted in primary care settings. A best evidence synthesis, including the results of the previous systematic review on this topic shows that there is strong evidence that higher shoulder pain intensity, concomitant neck pain and a longer duration of symptoms predict poorer outcome in primary care settings. In secondary care populations, strong evidence was found for the association between greater disability and poorer outcome and between the existence of previous shoulder pain and poorer outcome.

conclusionClinicians may take these factors into account in the management of their patients. Those with a worse prognosis may be monitored more frequently and the treatment plan modified if complaints persist.

Indexed as

HumansNeck PainNetherlandsOccupational DiseasesPrognosisShoulder Pain

Identifiers

PMID26453452
PMCPMC4600288
OpenAlexW1931544374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.