Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26453367›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nutrition education and behavior2016

LA Sprouts: A 12-Week Gardening, Nutrition, and Cooking Randomized Control Trial Improves Determinants of Dietary Behaviors.

Jaimie N Davis, Lauren C Martinez, Donna Spruijt-Metz, Nicole M Gatto

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaimie N DavisDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. Electronic address: Jaimie.davis@Austin.utexas.edu.
Lauren C MartinezDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Donna Spruijt-MetzCenter for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Nicole M GattoCenter for Nutrition, Healthy Lifestyles and Disease Prevention, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Linda Loma, CA.

Funding

Virtual Sprouts: Web-based Gardening Games to Teach Nutrition and Combat ObesityR25OD011113 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI RAGUSA, GISELE, SPRUIJT-METZ, DONNA D · 2012 to 2015
$874k
LA Sprouts: A garden/nutrition intervention to improve health for high-risk youthR21DK094066 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SPRUIJT-METZ, DONNA D · 2012 to 2013
$466k
NIDDK NIH HHS 5R21DK094066NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK094066NIH HHS R25 OD011113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of an exploratory 12-week nutrition, cooking, and gardening trial (LA Sprouts) on preference for fruit and vegetables (FV); willingness to try FV; identification of FV; self-efficacy to garden, eat, and cook FV; motivation to garden, eat, and cook FV; attitudes toward FV; nutrition and gardening knowledge; and home gardening habits.

designRandomized controlled trial.

settingFour elementary schools.

participantsThree hundred four predominately Hispanic/Latino third- through fifth-grade students were randomized to either the LA Sprouts group (n = 167 students) or control group (n = 137 students).

interventionTwelve-week after-school nutrition, cooking, and gardening intervention.

main outcome measuresDeterminants of dietary behavior as measured by questionnaire at baseline and postintervention. ANALYSIS: Analyses of covariance.

resultsAfter the 12-week program, compared with controls, LA Sprouts participants improved scores for identification of vegetables (+11% vs +5%; P = .001) and nutrition and gardening knowledge (+14.5% vs -5.0%; P = .003), and were more likely to garden at home (+7.5% vs -4.4%; P = .003).

conclusionsThe LA Sprouts program positively affected a number of determinants of dietary behaviors that suggest possible mechanisms by which gardening and nutrition education act to improve dietary intake and health outcomes.

Indexed as

CookingChildChild Nutrition SciencesFeeding BehaviorFemaleGardeningHealth EducationHealth PromotionHispanic or LatinoHumansLos AngelesMaleMotivationStudentsdietary intakegardening and nutrition interventionHispanic/Latino children

Identifiers

PMID26453367
PMCPMC5266541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.