Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26453339›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2015

Attitudes and use of medicinal plants during pregnancy among women at health care centers in three regions of Mali, West-Africa.

Cecilie Sogn Nergard, Thi Phung Than Ho, Drissa Diallo, Ngolo Ballo, Berit Smestad Paulsen, Hedvig Nordeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. African Herbal Medicines: Adverse Effects and Cytotoxic Potentials with Different Therapeutic Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cecilie Sogn NergardDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1065 Blindern, Oslo, N-0316, Norway. csnergard@gmail.com.
Thi Phung Than HoDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1065 Blindern, Oslo, N-0316, Norway. xkatietx@live.no.
Drissa DialloDepartment of Traditional Medicine, National Institute of Research in Public Health, Bamako, Mali. dri.diallo@yahoo.fr.
Ngolo BalloDepartment of Traditional Medicine, National Institute of Research in Public Health, Bamako, Mali. ngolo_ballo@yahoo.fr.
Berit Smestad PaulsenDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1065 Blindern, Oslo, N-0316, Norway. b.s.paulsen@farmasi.uio.no.
Hedvig NordengDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1065 Blindern, Oslo, N-0316, Norway. h.m.e.nordeng@farmasi.uio.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough, medicinal plants have been important for women's health historically, the knowledge about such use during pregnancy in developing countries is limited. This is the first quantitative, ethnobotanical study on Malian women's use of and attitudes towards the use of medicinal plants during pregnancy. The aim of the study was to describe Malian women's use of medicinal plants during pregnancy according to indications and to evaluate the potentially safety of such use. The overall aim was to preserve valuable information about medicinal plants for women's reproductive health for the future.

methodsData was collected through structured interviews of 209 pregnant women or mothers in three health care centers in Mali. The women were interviewed about their uses of medicinal plants during pregnancy and their attitudes to such use. Nine specific medicinal plants commonly used in Mali and treatment of eleven common ailments in pregnancy were specifically queried about.

resultsIn total, 79.9 % had used medicinal plants during pregnancy. Only 17 women (8.5 %) had received a recommendation from a traditional practitioner (TP). The most commonly used medicinal plants were Lippia chevalieri (55.5 %), Combretum micranthum (39.7 %), Parkia biglobosa (12.0 %) and Vepris heterophylla (8.1 %). The most common reasons for use were for well-being (37.7 %), symptoms of malaria (37.1 %) and "increased salt-elimination" (to reduce edema) (19.2 %). For treatment of symptoms of malaria and urinary tract infections during pregnancy, the women's choices of medicinal plants agreed with those previously reported from interviews with TPs. Almost 30 % believed that medicinal plants had no adverse effects for the mother.

conclusionThis study showed an extensive use and knowledge of medicinal plants during pregnancy in three regions in Mali. However, exclusive use of medicinal plants as treatment of malaria and urinary tract infections during pregnancy may pose a health risk for the mother and her unborn child. A wider collaboration with TPs, with local communities and conventional health workers of the health care centers, on the safe use of medicinal plants, is important to promote safer pregnancies and better health care for pregnant women and their unborn infants in Mali.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedicine, African TraditionalPhytotherapyPregnancyAdultCommunity Health CentersFemaleHumansMaliPlants, MedicinalWomen's HealthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26453339
PMCPMC4600315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.