Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26452750›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2015

Community based reproductive health interventions for young married couples in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review.

Archana Sarkar, Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli, Kushal Jain, Jagannath Behera, Surendra Kumar Mishra, Sunil Mehra

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Archana SarkarMonitoring, Evaluation & Research Division, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, B-5, Greater Kailash Enclave-II, New Delhi, 110048, India. archana.sarkar5@gmail.com.
Venkatraman Chandra-MouliDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. chandramouliv@who.int.
Kushal JainMonitoring, Evaluation & Research Division, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, B-5, Greater Kailash Enclave-II, New Delhi, 110048, India. kushal@mamtahimc.org.
Jagannath BeheraMonitoring, Evaluation & Research Division, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, B-5, Greater Kailash Enclave-II, New Delhi, 110048, India. jagannath@mamtahimc.org.
Surendra Kumar MishraMonitoring, Evaluation & Research Division, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, B-5, Greater Kailash Enclave-II, New Delhi, 110048, India. skmishra@mamtahimc.org.
Sunil MehraMonitoring, Evaluation & Research Division, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, B-5, Greater Kailash Enclave-II, New Delhi, 110048, India. dr_mehra@mamtahimc.org.
Mamta Health Institute for Mother and Child · INWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost pregnancies among adolescent girls and young women aged 15-24 years occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and do so within marriage. The mortality rates and pregnancy-related morbidities are significantly higher among the women of younger age group in many South Asian and Sub-Saharan African countries. This paper presents a review of the available evidence on the effectiveness of community-based health interventions to improve the reproductive health status of young married couples in LMICs.

methodWe carried out a systematic review of research studies and evaluation reports of different community-level initiatives in improving access to contraception, pregnancy care and safe abortion services by young married couples, where women were in the age-group of 15-24 years.

resultsOf the 14 projects, which met inclusion criteria, eight met the quality criteria and were included in the review (five from India, two from Nepal and one from Malawi). Our analysis shows that community-based interventions consisting of counseling of young married women, and their husbands, family and community members, as well as capacity building of health workers were some of the effective measures in increasing contraceptive use, delaying pregnancy and improving pregnancy care. Stratifying young women in line with their specific reproductive health needs (newly married woman, pregnant woman, mother of one/more children) was found to be a successful innovative strategy. None of these projects explicitly addressed improving access to safe abortion care.

conclusionOur review suggests that multi-layered community-based interventions, targeting young married women, their families and the health system can improve utilization of reproductive health services among young couples in resource-constrained settings. There is less focus on strategies to delay first pregnancy as compared to spacing among young women. Further, family and community level barriers in most of the project settings restricted its effective implementation. The paper emphasizes the need for further research to fill the knowledge gaps that exist about improving utilization of reproductive healthcare services, especially safe abortion care among young married women in LMICs.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAdolescentAdultCommunity Health ServicesContraceptionContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMarriagePregnancyReproductive HealthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26452750
PMCPMC4599316
OpenAlexW1953545353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.