ArticleInternational orthopaedics2016
Authorities and foundation of an orthopaedic school in Germany in the nineteenth century: Part I: Conrad Johann Martin Langenbeck; Georg Friedrich Louis Stromeyer; Bernhard Rudolf Conrad von Langenbeck; Johann Friedrich August von Esmarch.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthopaedic surgery as seen by artists and by surgeons: science or art?International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- History of club-foot treatment; part II: tenotomy in the nineteenth century.International orthopaedics · 2017Review
- History of external fixation for treatment of fractures.International orthopaedics · 2017Review
- The Vienna and German heritage of orthopaedics from the first half of the twentieth century: Adolf Lorenz, Lorenz Böhler, Friedrich Pauwels, Gerhard Küntscher.International orthopaedics · 2016Article
- Authorities and foundation of the orthopaedic school in Germany in the 19th century: part II: Richard von Volkmann, Julius Wolff, Albert Hoffa, Friedrich Trendelenburg and other German authors.International orthopaedics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe rapid development of surgery in Germany in the nineteenth century occurred for many reasons, particularly political and economic changes and cultural and scientific progress. This paper analyses the progress of orthopaedic surgery from an historical point of view.
methodsAfter Napoleon's defeat, a peace conference was held in Vienna (1814-1815). Prussia took a portion of Saxony, Austria and territories along the Rhine. The unification of Germany continued in 1850 and 1880; several wars occurred in the unification process, including against Denmark, Austria and France. These wars caused an urgent request for army surgeons and cooperation between civil and military practice.
resultsThe increase in the number of faculty institutes in surgery, the unification of different surgical organisations, and the organisation of scientific societies participated in this development. C. Langenbeck, G. Stromeyer, B. von Langenbeck and J.F. von Esmach were the most proactive surgeons of this period
conclusionImprovements in war surgery, percutaneous tenotomy, the foundation of the German Society of Surgery and bloodless surgical techniques for limbs were the most important innovations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26452677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.