Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26452470›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

A transcriptome approach towards understanding the development of ripening capacity in 'Bartlett' pears (Pyrus communis L.).

Ngoc T Nham, Sergio Tonetto de Freitas, Andrew J Macnish, Kevin M Carr, Trisha Kietikul, Angelo J Guilatco, Cai-Zhong Jiang, Florence Zakharov, Elizabeth J Mitcham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ngoc T NhamDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. ntnham@ucdavis.edu.
Sergio Tonetto de FreitasDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. stonettodefreitas@yahoo.com.br.
Andrew J MacnishDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. andrew.macnish@daf.qld.gov.au.
Kevin M CarrResearch Technology Support Facility, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. carrk@msu.edu.
Trisha KietikulDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. tkietikul@ucdavis.edu.
Angelo J GuilatcoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. ajguilatco@ucdavis.edu.
Cai-Zhong JiangAgriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. cjiang@ucdavis.edu.
Florence ZakharovDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. fnegre@ucdavis.edu.
Elizabeth J MitchamDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. ejmitcham@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe capacity of European pear fruit (Pyrus communis L.) to ripen after harvest develops during the final stages of growth on the tree. The objective of this study was to characterize changes in 'Bartlett' pear fruit physico-chemical properties and transcription profiles during fruit maturation leading to attainment of ripening capacity.

resultsThe softening response of pear fruit held for 14 days at 20 °C after harvest depended on their maturity. We identified four maturity stages: S1-failed to soften and S2- displayed partial softening (with or without ET-ethylene treatment); S3 - able to soften following ET; and S4 - able to soften without ET. Illumina sequencing and Trinity assembly generated 68,010 unigenes (mean length of 911 bp), of which 32.8 % were annotated to the RefSeq plant database. Higher numbers of differentially expressed transcripts were recorded in the S3-S4 and S1-S2 transitions (2805 and 2505 unigenes, respectively) than in the S2-S3 transition (2037 unigenes). High expression of genes putatively encoding pectin degradation enzymes in the S1-S2 transition suggests pectic oligomers may be involved as early signals triggering the transition to responsiveness to ethylene in pear fruit. Moreover, the co-expression of these genes with Exps (Expansins) suggests their collaboration in modifying cell wall polysaccharide networks that are required for fruit growth. K-means cluster analysis revealed that auxin signaling associated transcripts were enriched in cluster K6 that showed the highest gene expression at S3. AP2/EREBP (APETALA 2/ethylene response element binding protein) and bHLH (basic helix-loop-helix) transcripts were enriched in all three transition S1-S2, S2-S3, and S3-S4. Several members of Aux/IAA (Auxin/indole-3-acetic acid), ARF (Auxin response factors), and WRKY appeared to play an important role in orchestrating the S2-S3 transition.

conclusionsWe identified maturity stages associated with the development of ripening capacity in 'Bartlett' pear, and described the transcription profile of fruit at these stages. Our findings suggest that auxin is essential in regulating the transition of pear fruit from being ethylene-unresponsive (S2) to ethylene-responsive (S3), resulting in fruit softening. The transcriptome will be helpful for future studies about specific developmental pathways regulating the transition to ripening.

Indexed as

EthylenesFruitGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Expression Regulation, PlantIndoleacetic AcidsPlant ProteinsPyrusTranscriptomeethyleneEthylenesIndoleacetic AcidsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26452470
PMCPMC4600301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.