Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26452342›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Early oral switch therapy in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Achim J Kaasch, Gerd Fätkenheuer, Reinhild Prinz-Langenohl, Ursula Paulus, Martin Hellmich, Verena Weiß, Norma Jung, Siegbert Rieg, Winfried V Kern, Harald Seifert and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01792804 phase3completednot on this map

Early Oral Switch Therapy in Low-risk Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorHeinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRan2013 to 2020Enrolled215ConditionsStaphylococcus Aureus InfectionArmsTrimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, Clindamycin, Linezolid, Flucloxacillin, Cloxacillin
NCT03514446 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Seven and Fourteen Days of Antibiotic Treatment in Uncomplicated Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Randomized, Non-blinded, Non-inferiority Interventional Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas BenfieldRan2018 to 2021Enrolled284ConditionsStaphylococcus Aureus BacteremiaArmsAntibiotic therapy duration for 7 days
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Contemporary Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia-Controversies in Clinical Practice.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Review
  4. Global Differences in the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: No International Standard of Care.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Oral step-down forClinical infection in practice · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Early Oral Antibiotic Switch forAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  9. Efficacy of Early Oral Switch with β-Lactams for Low-RiskAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  10. A case study onJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Duration of antibiotic therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: the long and the short of it.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Management ofFrontiers in medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A new simplified predictive model for mortality in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Achim J KaaschInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Goldenfelsstr. 19-21, D-50935, Köln, Germany. achim.kaasch@uk-koeln.de.
Gerd FätkenheuerDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50924, Cologne, Germany. g.faetkenheuer@uni-koeln.de.
Reinhild Prinz-LangenohlClinical Trial Center Cologne, University of Cologne, 50924, Cologne, Germany. reinhild.prinz-langenohl@uk-koeln.de.
Ursula PaulusClinical Trial Center Cologne, University of Cologne, 50924, Cologne, Germany. ursula.paulus@uk-koeln.de.
Martin HellmichInstitute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany. martin.hellmich@uni-koeln.de.
Verena WeißInstitute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany. verena.weiss@uni-koeln.de.
Norma JungDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50924, Cologne, Germany. norma.jung@uk-koeln.de.
Siegbert RiegDepartment of Medicine, Center for Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. siegbert.rieg@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Winfried V KernDepartment of Medicine, Center for Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. winfried.kern@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Harald SeifertInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Goldenfelsstr. 19-21, D-50935, Köln, Germany. harald.seifert@uni-koeln.de.
SABATO trial group (with linked authorship to the individuals in the Acknowledgements section)
University of Cologne · DETH Köln - University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEGerman Center for Infection Research · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend that patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) are treated with long courses of intravenous antimicrobial therapy. This serves to avoid SAB-related complications such as relapses, local extension and distant metastatic foci. However, in certain clinical scenarios, the incidence of SAB-related complications is low. Patients with a low-risk for complications may thus benefit from an early switch to oral medication through earlier discharge and fewer complications of intravenous therapy. The major objective for the SABATO trial is to demonstrate that in patients with low-risk SAB a switch from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy (oral switch therapy, OST) is non-inferior to a conventional course of intravenous therapy (intravenous standard therapy, IST). METHODS/

designThe trial is designed as randomized, parallel-group, observer-blinded, clinical non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of a SAB-related complication (relapsing SAB, deep-seated infection, and attributable mortality) within 90 days. Secondary endpoints are the length of hospital stay; 14-day, 30-day, and 90-day mortality; and complications of intravenous therapy. Patients with SAB who have received 5 to 7 full days of adequate intravenous antimicrobial therapy are eligible. Main exclusion criteria are polymicrobial bloodstream infection, signs and symptoms of complicated SAB (deep-seated infection, hematogenous dissemination, septic shock, and prolonged bacteremia), the presence of a non-removable foreign body, and severe comorbidity. Patients will receive either OST or IST with a protocol-approved antimicrobial and are followed up for 90 days. Four hundred thirty patients will be randomized 1:1 in two study arms. Efficacy regarding incidence of SAB-related complications is tested sequentially with a non-inferiority margin of 10 and 5 percentage points. DISCUSSION: The SABATO trial assesses whether early oral switch therapy is safe and effective for patients with low-risk SAB. Regardless of the result, this pragmatic trial will strongly influence the standard of care in SAB.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01792804 registered 13 February 2013; German Clinical trials register DRKS00004741 registered 4 October 2013, EudraCT 2013-000577-77 . First patient randomized on 20 December 2013.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaClinical ProtocolsDisease ProgressionEuropeHumansRecurrenceResearch DesignRisk FactorsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26452342
PMCPMC4600306
OpenAlexW1820841500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.