Trial reportTrials2015
Early oral switch therapy in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Oral Switch Therapy in Low-risk Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection
Efficacy of Seven and Fourteen Days of Antibiotic Treatment in Uncomplicated Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Randomized, Non-blinded, Non-inferiority Interventional Study
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complexity and comorbidities: critical considerations for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia outcomes in the Northern Territory.Internal medicine journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Contemporary Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia-Controversies in Clinical Practice.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Review
- Global Differences in the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: No International Standard of Care.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Article
- Conventional Hospitalization versus Sequential Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Oral step-down forClinical infection in practice · 2022Article
- Clinical Outcomes of an Innovative Cefazolin Delivery Program for MSSA Infections in OPAT.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Early Oral Antibiotic Switch forAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- Efficacy of Early Oral Switch with β-Lactams for Low-RiskAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- A case study onJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2020Review
- A Narrative Review of Early Oral Stepdown Therapy for the Treatment of UncomplicatedOpen forum infectious diseases · 2020Review
- Duration of antibiotic therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: the long and the short of it.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2020Article
- Article
- Management ofFrontiers in medicine · 2020Review
- Development of quality indicators for the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2019Article
- Article
- A new simplified predictive model for mortality in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019Article
- Effect of Clinically Uninfected Orthopedic Implants and Pacemakers/AICDs in Low-RiskOpen forum infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend that patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) are treated with long courses of intravenous antimicrobial therapy. This serves to avoid SAB-related complications such as relapses, local extension and distant metastatic foci. However, in certain clinical scenarios, the incidence of SAB-related complications is low. Patients with a low-risk for complications may thus benefit from an early switch to oral medication through earlier discharge and fewer complications of intravenous therapy. The major objective for the SABATO trial is to demonstrate that in patients with low-risk SAB a switch from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy (oral switch therapy, OST) is non-inferior to a conventional course of intravenous therapy (intravenous standard therapy, IST). METHODS/
designThe trial is designed as randomized, parallel-group, observer-blinded, clinical non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of a SAB-related complication (relapsing SAB, deep-seated infection, and attributable mortality) within 90 days. Secondary endpoints are the length of hospital stay; 14-day, 30-day, and 90-day mortality; and complications of intravenous therapy. Patients with SAB who have received 5 to 7 full days of adequate intravenous antimicrobial therapy are eligible. Main exclusion criteria are polymicrobial bloodstream infection, signs and symptoms of complicated SAB (deep-seated infection, hematogenous dissemination, septic shock, and prolonged bacteremia), the presence of a non-removable foreign body, and severe comorbidity. Patients will receive either OST or IST with a protocol-approved antimicrobial and are followed up for 90 days. Four hundred thirty patients will be randomized 1:1 in two study arms. Efficacy regarding incidence of SAB-related complications is tested sequentially with a non-inferiority margin of 10 and 5 percentage points. DISCUSSION: The SABATO trial assesses whether early oral switch therapy is safe and effective for patients with low-risk SAB. Regardless of the result, this pragmatic trial will strongly influence the standard of care in SAB.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01792804 registered 13 February 2013; German Clinical trials register DRKS00004741 registered 4 October 2013, EudraCT 2013-000577-77 . First patient randomized on 20 December 2013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.