Trial reportPsychosomatic medicine2016
Cardiac Risk Markers and Response to Depression Treatment in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.
Trial report in Psychosomatic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Somatic and sociodemographic predictors of depression outcome among depressed patients with coronary artery disease - a secondary analysis of the SPIRR-CAD study.BMC psychiatry · 2019Trial
- Clinical predictors of depression treatment outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2016Trial
- Efficacy of Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Reducing Depression among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Inflammation and Cognition in Depression: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Illness beliefs about depression among patients seeking depression care and patients seeking cardiac care: an exploratory analysis using a mixed method design.BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- Depression and cardiac dysautonomia in eating disorders.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2018Article
- Residual Symptoms After Treatment for Depression in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.Psychosomatic medicine · 2018Article
- The Techniques for Overcoming Depression Questionnaire: Mokken Scale Analysis, Reliability, and Concurrent Validity in Depressed Cardiac Patients.Cognitive therapy and research · 2017Article
- Nighttime heart rate predicts response to depression treatment in patients with coronary heart disease.Journal of affective disorders · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepression is associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. There is evidence that this risk may be reduced in patients who respond to depression treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether cardiac risk markers predict poor response to depression treatment and, second, whether they improve with successful treatment.
methodsOne hundred fifty-seven patients with stable coronary heart disease who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria for a moderate to severe major depressive episode were treated with cognitive behavior therapy, either alone or combined with an antidepressant, for up to 16 weeks. Depression, physical activity, sleep quality, thyroid hormones (total thyroxine [T4] and free T4), and inflammatory blood markers (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor) were assessed at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment.
resultsThe mean (SD) Beck Depression Inventory scores were 30.2 (8.5) at baseline and 8.5 (7.8) at 16 weeks. More than 50% of the participants met the criteria for depression remission (17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ≤ 7) at 16 weeks. Only free T4 thyroid hormone at baseline predicted poor response to depression treatment after adjustment for potential confounders (p = .004). Improvement in sleep quality (p = .012) and physical activity level (p = .041) correlated with improvement in depression. None of the inflammatory markers predicted posttreatment depression or changed with depression.
conclusionsThyroid hormone (T4) level predicted depression treatment outcome, and improvement in depression correlated with improvement in sleep and physical activity. More detailed studies of thyroid function and objective assessments of sleep and physical activity in relation to depression improvement and cardiac outcomes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.