Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26452147›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Semi-Supervised Approach for Refining Transcriptional Signatures of Drug Response and Repositioning Predictions.

Francesco Iorio, Roshan L Shrestha, Nicolas Levin, Viviane Boilot, Mathew J Garnett, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Viji M Draviam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Drug Repurposing: A Leading Strategy for New Threats and Targets.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesco IorioEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Roshan L ShresthaDepartment of Genetics-University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EH, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nicolas LevinDepartment of Genetics-University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EH, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Viviane BoilotDepartment of Genetics-University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EH, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mathew J GarnettCancer genome project-Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Julio Saez-RodriguezEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, CB10 1SD, Cambridge, United Kingdom; RWTH-Aachen University Hospital, Templergraben 55, 52062, Aachen, Germany.
Viji M DraviamDepartment of Genetics-University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EH, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a novel strategy to identify drug-repositioning opportunities. The starting point of our method is the generation of a signature summarising the consensual transcriptional response of multiple human cell lines to a compound of interest (namely the seed compound). This signature can be derived from data in existing databases, such as the connectivity-map, and it is used at first instance to query a network interlinking all the connectivity-map compounds, based on the similarity of their transcriptional responses. This provides a drug neighbourhood, composed of compounds predicted to share some effects with the seed one. The original signature is then refined by systematically reducing its overlap with the transcriptional responses induced by drugs in this neighbourhood that are known to share a secondary effect with the seed compound. Finally, the drug network is queried again with the resulting refined signatures and the whole process is carried on for a number of iterations. Drugs in the final refined neighbourhood are then predicted to exert the principal mode of action of the seed compound. We illustrate our approach using paclitaxel (a microtubule stabilising agent) as seed compound. Our method predicts that glipizide and splitomicin perturb microtubule function in human cells: a result that could not be obtained through standard signature matching methods. In agreement, we find that glipizide and splitomicin reduce interphase microtubule growth rates and transiently increase the percentage of mitotic cells-consistent with our prediction. Finally, we validated the refined signatures of paclitaxel response by mining a large drug screening dataset, showing that human cancer cell lines whose basal transcriptional profile is anti-correlated to them are significantly more sensitive to paclitaxel and docetaxel.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug RepositioningModels, BiologicalGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHeLa CellsHumansNeoplasmsTranscription, GeneticAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26452147
PMCPMC4599732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.