Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26451982›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2015

Association Between TP53 Gene Codon 72 Polymorphism and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Susceptibility: Evidence Based on a Meta-Analysis.

Xiao-Lan Ruan, Sheng Li, Peiliang Geng, Xian-Tao Zeng, Guo-Zheng Yu, Xiang-Yu Meng, Qing-Ping Gao, Xu-Bin Ao

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Upregulation of Leukocytic Syncytin-1 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao-Lan RuanDepartment of Hematology, Targeted Biotherapy Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Sheng LiCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Peiliang GengCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China (mainland).
Xian-Tao ZengCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Guo-Zheng YuCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Xiang-Yu MengCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Qing-Ping GaoDepartment of Hematology, Targeted Biotherapy Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Xu-Bin AoDepartment of Hematology, Targeted Biotherapy Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies have reported that the p53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) susceptibility; however, the conclusions are inconsistent. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to obtain a more precise result. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe searched PubMed to identify relevant studies, and 6 published case-control studies were retrieved, including 924 AML patients and 3832 controls. Odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was applied to assess the association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and AML susceptibility. The meta-analysis was performed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 2.2.

resultsOverall, no significant association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and AML susceptibility was found in this meta-analysis (Pro vs. Arg: OR=0.94, 95%CI=0.81-1.10; Pro/Pro vs. Arg/Arg: OR=0.93, 95%CI=0.71-1.22; Arg/Pro vs. Arg/Arg: OR=0.79, 95%CI=0.55-1.13; (Pro/Pro + Arg/Pro) vs. Arg/Arg: OR=0.84, 95%CI=0.62-1.13; Pro/Pro vs. (Arg/Arg + Arg/Pro): OR=1.06, 95%CI=0.83-1.35). Similar results were also found in stratified analysis according to ethnicity and source of controls.

conclusionsOur meta-analysis demonstrates that p53 codon 72 polymorphism may not be a risk factor for AML, which should be verified in future studies.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticCase-Control StudiesCodonGenotypeHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteOdds RatioReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53CodonTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26451982
PMCPMC4603608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.