Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26451979›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2015

Diversity in protein domain superfamilies.

Sayoni Das, Natalie L Dawson, Christine A Orengo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Computational Protein Design - Where it goes?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Retracing the evolution of a modern periplasmic binding protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Resurrecting Enzymes by Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Three-dimensional Structure Databases of Biological Macromolecules.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Structural dynamics in the evolution of a bilobed protein scaffold.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sayoni DasInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, UCL, 627 Darwin Building, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Natalie L DawsonInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, UCL, 627 Darwin Building, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Christine A OrengoInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, UCL, 627 Darwin Building, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address: c.orengo@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whilst ∼93% of domain superfamilies appear to be relatively structurally and functionally conserved based on the available data from the CATH-Gene3D domain classification resource, the remainder are much more diverse. In this review, we consider how domains in some of the most ubiquitous and promiscuous superfamilies have evolved, in particular the plasticity in their functional sites and surfaces which expands the repertoire of molecules they interact with and actions performed on them. To what extent can we identify a core function for these superfamilies which would allow us to develop a 'domain grammar of function' whereby a protein's biological role can be proposed from its constituent domains? Clearly the first step is to understand the extent to which these components vary and how changes in their molecular make-up modifies function.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein Structure, TertiaryAmino Acid SequenceProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26451979
PMCPMC4686048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.