ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2015
Multilayered Magnetic Gelatin Membrane Scaffolds.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetized Cell-Scaffold Constructs for Bone Tissue Engineering: Advances in Fabrication and Magnetic Stimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Biomaterials functionalized with magnetic nanoparticles for tissue engineering: Between advantages and challenges.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2024Article
- Modeling of Magnetic Scaffolds as Drug Delivery Platforms for Tissue Engineering and Cancer Therapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Review of Biomimetic and Biodegradable Magnetic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Advanced 3D Magnetic Scaffolds for Tumor-Related Bone Defects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Composite Materials Based on Gelatin and Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for MRI Accuracy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comprehensive Survey on Nanobiomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Designing of Chitosan Derivatives Nanoparticles with Antiangiogenic Effect for Cancer Therapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A versatile approach for the design and fabrication of multilayer magnetic scaffolds with tunable magnetic gradients is described. Multilayer magnetic gelatin membrane scaffolds with intrinsic magnetic gradients were designed to encapsulate magnetized bioagents under an externally applied magnetic field for use in magnetic-field-assisted tissue engineering. The temperature of the individual membranes increased up to 43.7 °C under an applied oscillating magnetic field for 70 s by magnetic hyperthermia, enabling the possibility of inducing a thermal gradient inside the final 3D multilayer magnetic scaffolds. On the basis of finite element method simulations, magnetic gelatin membranes with different concentrations of magnetic nanoparticles were assembled into 3D multilayered scaffolds. A magnetic-gradient-controlled distribution of magnetically labeled stem cells was demonstrated in vitro. This magnetic biomaterial-magnetic cell strategy can be expanded to a number of different magnetic biomaterials for various tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.