Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26451649›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2015

Deep sequencing in library selection projects: what insight does it bring?

J Glanville, S D'Angelo, T A Khan, S T Reddy, L Naranjo, F Ferrara, A R M Bradbury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J GlanvilleProgram in Computational and Systems Immunology, Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
S D'AngeloUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Division of Molecular Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
T A KhanETH Zurich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Basel, Switzerland.
S T ReddyETH Zurich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Basel, Switzerland.
L NaranjoBioscience division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
F FerraraUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Division of Molecular Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
A R M BradburyBioscience division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA. Electronic address: amb@lanl.gov.

Funding

A high throughput pipeline to select renewable recombinant polyclonal antibodiesU54DK093500 · NIDDK · LOS ALAMOS NAT SECTY-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI BRADBURY, ANDREW · 2011 to 2013
$4.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1-U54-DK093500-01NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK093500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High throughput sequencing is poised to change all aspects of the way antibodies and other binders are discovered and engineered. Millions of available sequence reads provide an unprecedented sampling depth able to guide the design and construction of effective, high quality naïve libraries containing tens of billions of unique molecules. Furthermore, during selections, high throughput sequencing enables quantitative tracing of enriched clones and position-specific guidance to amino acid variation under positive selection during antibody engineering. Successful application of the technologies relies on specific PCR reagent design, correct sequencing platform selection, and effective use of computational tools and statistical measures to remove error, identify antibodies, estimate diversity, and extract signatures of selection from the clone down to individual structural positions. Here we review these considerations and discuss some of the remaining challenges to the widespread adoption of the technology.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryAntibodiesDatabases, FactualHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular BiologySequence Analysis, DNAAntibodiesPeptide Library

Identifiers

PMID26451649
PMCPMC4648538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.