Trial reportBioMed research international2015
Stem Cell Therapy for Corneal Epithelium Regeneration following Good Manufacturing and Clinical Procedures.
Trial report in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03884569 (Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation (CLET) for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency (LSCD): an Observational Study on Safety and Effectiveness
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outcomes of surgical interventions for the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency.The Indian journal of medical research · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of clinical research on regenerative medicine for the cornea.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2021Pooled it
- Outcomes of Limbal Stem Cell Transplant: A Meta-analysis.JAMA ophthalmology · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis investigating autograft versus allograft cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation in limbal stem cell deficiency.International ophthalmology · 2019Pooled it
- Diagnostic criteria for limbal stem cell deficiency before surgical intervention-A systematic literature review and analysis.Survey of ophthalmologyPooled it
- Bioartificial human corneas generated by tissue engineering. A historical and technical review.Histology and histopathology · 2026Review
- Allogenic Cultured Limbal Epithelial Transplantation and Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Transplantation in Limbal Stem Cells Deficiency: A Comparative Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Biomedical Application of MSCs in Corneal Regeneration and Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- AI-driven strategies for advancing corneal cell therapy: a promising frontier.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- A novel tissue-engineered corneal epithelium based on ultra-thin amniotic membrane and mesenchymal stem cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Beyond Vision: An Overview of Regenerative Medicine and Its Current Applications in Ophthalmological Care.Cells · 2024Review
- Advanced bioengineering strategies broaden the therapeutic landscape for corneal failure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Limbal stem cell deficiency: Demography, aetiology, and clinical presentation in Eastern India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Focus on limbal stem cell deficiency and limbal cell transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2023Review
- In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency After Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation: A Sub-analysis from a Phase I-II Clinical Trial.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Cultivated autologous limbal epithelial cell (CALEC) transplantation: Development of manufacturing process and clinical evaluation of feasibility and safety.Science advances · 2023Article
- Advancements in Ocular Regenerative Therapies.Biology · 2023Review
- Potency assays and biomarkers for cell-based advanced therapy medicinal products.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Review
- Cultivated Autologous Limbal Epithelial Cell Transplantation: New Frontier in the Treatment of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.American journal of ophthalmology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate outcomes of cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET) for management of ocular surface failure due to limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).
designProspective, noncomparative, interventional case series and extensive comparison with recent similar studies.
participantsTwenty eyes with LSCD underwent CLET (11 autologous; 9 allogeneic) and were followed up for 3 years. Etiologies were divided into 3 prognostic categories: Group 1, chemical injuries (7 eyes); Group 2, immune-based inflammation (4 eyes); and Group 3, noninflammatory diseases (9 eyes). Intervention. Autologous and allogeneic limbal epithelial cells were cultivated on amniotic membranes and transplanted. Evaluations were based on clinical parameters, survival analysis, and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). European Union Tissues/Cells Directive and good manufacturing procedures were followed.
main outcome measuresImproved clinical parameters, absence of epithelial defects, and improved central corneal epithelial phenotype.
resultsSuccess rate was 80% at 1-2 years and 75% at 3 years. Autografts and allografts had similar survival. Success rate was significantly lower in prognostic Group 1 (42.9%) than in Groups 2-3 (100% each). All clinical parameters improved substantially. By IVCM, 80% of cases improved in epithelial status.
conclusionsCLET improved corneal epithelium quality, with subsequent improvement in symptoms, quality of life, and vision. These results confirm that CLET is a valid therapy for ocular surface failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.