Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26451328›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2015

Challenges and Opportunities for Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology in Cancer Immunotherapy: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, and Something Blue.

M Stroh, D J Carlile, C-C Li, J Wagg, B Ribba, S Ramanujan, J Jin, J Xu, J-E Charoin, Z-X Xhu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

M StrohDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech South San Francisco, California, USA.
D J CarlileDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Roche Innovation Center Welwyn, UK.
C-C LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech South San Francisco, California, USA.
J WaggRoche Innovation Center Basel Switzerland.
B RibbaRoche Innovation Center Basel Switzerland.
S RamanujanDepartment of Preclinical and Translational PKPD, Genentech South San Francisco, CA, USA.
J JinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech South San Francisco, California, USA.
J XuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech South San Francisco, California, USA.
J-E CharoinRoche Innovation Center Basel Switzerland.
Z-X XhuRoche Innovation Center New York New York, USA.
P N MorcosDepartment of Preclinical and Translational PKPD, Genentech South San Francisco, CA, USA.
J D DavisDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech South San Francisco, California, USA.
A PhippsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Roche Innovation Center Welwyn, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy (CIT) initiates or enhances the host immune response against cancer. Following decades of development, patients with previously few therapeutic options may now benefit from CIT. Although the quantitative clinical pharmacology (qCP) of previous classes of anticancer drugs has matured during this time, application to CIT may not be straightforward since CIT acts via the immune system. Here we discuss where qCP approaches might best borrow or start anew for CIT.

Identifiers

PMID26451328
PMCPMC4592528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.