Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26451244›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical radiation sciences2015

MRI screening for breast cancer in women at high risk; is the Australian breast MRI screening access program addressing the needs of women at high risk of breast cancer?

Tess Schenberg, Gillian Mitchell, Donna Taylor, Christobel Saunders

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tess SchenbergDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne, Victoria, Australia ; Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gillian MitchellFamilial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne, Victoria, Australia ; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Donna TaylorSchool of Surgery, University of Western Australia Perth, Western Australia, Australia ; Department of Radiology, Royal Perth Hospital Perth, Western Australia, Australia ; BreastScreen Western Australia, Adelaide Terrace Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Christobel SaundersSchool of Surgery, University of Western Australia Perth, Western Australia, Australia ; Department of General Surgery, St John of God Hospital Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening of women under 50 years old at high familial risk of breast cancer was given interim funding by Medicare in 2009 on the basis that a review would be undertaken. An updated literature review has been undertaken by the Medical Services Advisory Committee but there has been no assessment of the quality of the screening or other screening outcomes. This review examines the evidence basis of breast MRI screening and how this fits within an Australian context with the purpose of informing future modifications to the provision of Medicare-funded breast MRI screening in Australia. Issues discussed will include selection of high-risk women, the options for MRI screening frequency and measuring the outcomes of screening.

Indexed as

Australiabreastbreast neoplasmsmagnetic resonance imagingmedicare

Identifiers

PMID26451244
PMCPMC4592676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.