ArticleCanadian medical education journal2013
Towards a program of focused and applied curriculum research.
Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Against research: a case for the scholarship of application in Medical Education.Canadian medical education journal · 2025Article
- Ethical globalization? Decolonizing theoretical perspectives for internationalization in Canadian medical education.Canadian medical education journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Though hundreds of journal pages have been packed with studies describing, analyzing, and synthesizing the benefits of Problem-based Learning (PBL) over conventional curricula, we still don't really know why. Currently it is impossible to say which of the various elements contributes to any incremental student learning. We need to apply the scientific method to studies of curriculum delivery. Accumulating evidence from strong studies in messy real-world situations will eventually yield important insights and instrumental truths for real medical schools that teachers and administrators can then implement. Examples of feasible experimental designs might include a factorial study. More effective curriculum development is possible only through a renewed applied research agenda that is both focused and grounded in the real world.
Identifiers
26451215PMC4563608What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.