Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26451152›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2015

Evaluation of an Epitypified Ophiocordyceps formosana (Cordyceps s.l.) for Its Pharmacological Potential.

Yen-Wen Wang, Tzu-Wen Hong, Yu-Ling Tai, Ying-Jing Wang, Sheng-Hong Tsai, Pham Thi Kim Lien, Tzu-Ho Chou, Jui-Ya Lai, Richard Chu, Shih-Torng Ding and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Uncovering cryptic species diversity ofFungal systematics and evolution · 2024
    Article
  8. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  9. Effectiveness and Safety of OralEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yen-Wen WangDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Tzu-Wen HongMucho Biotechnology Inc., Taipei 10684, Taiwan.
Yu-Ling TaiDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Ying-Jing WangDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Sheng-Hong TsaiMucho Biotechnology Inc., Taipei 10684, Taiwan.
Pham Thi Kim LienGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan.
Tzu-Ho ChouDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Jui-Ya LaiMucho Biotechnology Inc., Taipei 10684, Taiwan.
Richard ChuMucho Biotechnology Inc., Taipei 10684, Taiwan.
Shih-Torng DingDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10672, Taiwan ; Center for Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Kenji IrieGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan ; Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan.
Tsai-Kun LiCenter for Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan ; Graduate Institute of Microbiology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
Shean-Shong TzeanDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Tang-Long ShenDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan ; Center for Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The substantial merit of Cordyceps s.l. spp. in terms of medicinal benefits is largely appreciated. Nevertheless, only few studies have characterized and examined the clinical complications of the use of health tonics containing these species. Here, we epitypified C. formosana isolates that were collected and characterized as Ophiocordyceps formosana based on morphological characteristics, molecular phylogenetic analyses, and metabolite profiling. Thus, we renamed and transferred C. formosana to the new protologue Ophiocordyceps formosana (Kobayasi & Shimizu) Wang, Tsai, Tzean & Shen comb. nov. Additionally, the pharmacological potential of O. formosana was evaluated based on the hot-water extract from its mycelium. The relative amounts of the known bioactive ingredients that are unique to Cordyceps s.l. species in O. formosana were found to be similar to the amounts in O. sinensis and C. militaris, indicating the potential applicability of O. formosana for pharmacological uses. Additionally, we found that O. formosana exhibited antioxidation activities in vitro and in vivo that were similar to those of O. sinensis and C. militaris. Furthermore, O. formosana also displayed conspicuously effective antitumor activity compared with the tested Cordyceps s.l. species. Intrinsically, O. formosana exhibited less toxicity than the other Cordyceps species. Together, our data suggest that the metabolites of O. formosana may play active roles in complementary medicine.

Identifiers

PMID26451152
PMCPMC4587430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.