Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26451130›Full record

ArticleAsia Pacific family medicine2015

The cultural context of teaching and learning sexual health care examinations in Japan: a mixed methods case study assessing the use of standardized patient instructors among Japanese family physician trainees of the Shizuoka Family Medicine Program.

Cameron G Shultz, Michael S Chu, Ayaka Yajima, Eric P Skye, Kiyoshi Sano, Machiko Inoue, Tsukasa Tsuda, Michael D Fetters

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia Pacific family medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Cameron G ShultzDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, 1018 Fuller Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1213 USA.
Michael S ChuUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI USA ; Virginia Mason Medical Center, Internal Medicine Residency, Seattle, Washington USA.
Ayaka YajimaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, 1018 Fuller Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1213 USA.
Eric P SkyeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, 1018 Fuller Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1213 USA.
Kiyoshi SanoDepartment of Family Medicine, Tokushukai Hospital Corporation, Haibara General Hospital, Makinohara, Shizuoka Japan.
Machiko InoueDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Japan.
Tsukasa TsudaAkatchi Family Medicine Center, Kikugawa, Shizuoka Japan.
Michael D FettersDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, 1018 Fuller Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1213 USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USDay Family Medicine · USHaibara General Hospital · JPHamamatsu University · JPVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn contrast to many western nations where family medicine is a cornerstone of the primary care workforce, in Japan the specialty is still developing. A number of services within the bailiwick of family medicine have yet to be fully incorporated into Japanese family medicine training programs, especially those associated with sexual health. This gap constitutes a lost opportunity for addressing sexual health-related conditions, including cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. In this mixed methods case study we investigated the perceived acceptability and impact of a standardized patient instructor (SPI) program that trained Japanese family medicine residents in female breast, pelvic, male genital, and prostate examinations. CASE DESCRIPTION: Building on an existing partnership between the University of Michigan, USA, and the Shizuoka Family Medicine Program, Japan, Japanese family medicine residents received SPI-based training in female breast, pelvic, male genital, and prostate examinations at the University of Michigan. A mixed methods case study targeting residents, trainers, and staff was employed using post-training feedback, semi-structured interviews, and web-based questionnaire. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: Residents' and SPIs' perceptions of the training were universally positive, with SPIs observing a positive effect on residents' knowledge, confidence, and skill. SPIs found specific instruction-related approaches to be particularly helpful, such as the positioning of the interpreter and the timing of interpreter use. SPIs provided an important opportunity for residents to learn about the patient's perspective and to practice newly learned skills. Respondents noted a general preference for gender concordance when providing gender-specific health care; also noted were too few opportunities to practice skills after returning to Japan. For cultural reasons, both residents and staff deemed it would be difficult to implement a similar SPI-based program within Japan.

conclusionsWhile the SPI program was perceived favorably, without sufficient practice and supervision the skills acquired by residents during the training may not be fully retained. Deep-rooted taboos surrounding gender-specific health care appear to be a significant barrier preventing experimentation with SPI-based sexual health training in Japan. The feasibility of implementing a similar training program within Japan remains uncertain. More research is needed to understand challenges and how they can be overcome.

Indexed as

Family medicineJapanSexual healthStandardized patient instructors

Identifiers

PMID26451130
PMCPMC4597438
OpenAlexW2144320811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.