ArticleBehaviour & information technology
Technology-mediated information sharing between patients and clinicians in primary care encounters.
Article in Behaviour & information technology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Patient-Provider Communication and Therapeutic Practice Through Better Integration of Electronic Health Records in the Exam Room: A Pilot Study.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2019Trial
- Article
- Evaluation of Eye Gaze Dynamics During Physician-Patient-Computer Interaction in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Systematic Analysis.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Towards an ethical multiplicity in low back pain care: Practising beyond the biopsychosocial model.Sociology of health & illness · 2023Article
- Bugs in the Virtual Clinic: Confronting Telemedicine's Challenges Through Empathy and Support.Journal of participatory medicine · 2022Article
- Automatic Classification of Screen Gaze and Dialogue in Doctor-Patient-Computer Interactions: Computational Ethnography Algorithm Development and Validation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Designing an electronic blood-borne virus risk alert to improve uptake of testing.International journal of STD & AIDS · 2020Article
- Provider Preference in Exam Room Layout Design and Computing.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Article
- The electronic health record as a patient engagement tool: mirroring clinicians' screen to create a shared mental model.JAMIA open · 2018Article
- What Patients Value About Reading Visit Notes: A Qualitative Inquiry of Patient Experiences With Their Health Information.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Capturing the patients' voices: Planning for patient-centered electronic health record use.International journal of medical informatics · 2016Article
- Capsule Commentary on Lee et al., Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
- Computers in the clinical encounter: a scoping review and thematic analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Designing Patient-facing Health Information Technologies for the Outpatient Settings: A Literature Review.Journal of innovation in health informatics · 2016Review
- Work system factors influencing physicians' screen sharing behaviors in primary care encounters.International journal of medical informatics · 2015Article
- Using tablet-based technology in patient education about systemic therapy options for early-stage breast cancer: a pilot study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2015Article
- Exploring Residents' Interactions With Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Encounters.Family medicine · 2015Article
- How physician electronic health record screen sharing affects patient and doctor non-verbal communication in primary care.Patient education and counseling · 2015Article
- Using video-based observation research methods in primary care health encounters to evaluate complex interactions.Informatics in primary care · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify and describe the use of electronic health records for information sharing between patients and clinicians in primary care encounters. This topic is particularly important as computers and other technologies are increasingly implemented in multi-user health care settings where interactions and communication between patients and clinicians are integral to interpersonal and organizational outcomes.
methodAn ethnographic approach was used to classify the encounters into distinct technology-use patterns based on clinicians` interactions with the technology and patients. Each technology-use pattern was quantitatively analysed to assist with comparison. Quantitative analysis was based on duration of patient and clinician gaze at EHR.
findingsPhysicians employed three different styles to share information using EHRs: Active information-sharing, in which a clinician turns the monitor towards the patient and uses the computer to actively share information with the patient;Passive information-sharing, when a clinician does not move the monitor, but the patient might see the monitor by leaning in if they choose; andTechnology withdrawal, when a clinician does not share the monitor with the patient.
conclusionA variety of technology-mediated information-sharing styles may be effective in providing patient-centred care. New EHR designs may be needed to facilitate information sharing between patients and clinicians.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.