Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26451029›Full record

ReviewStroke2015

Lipids and Cerebrovascular Disease: Research and Practice.

Shadi Yaghi, Mitchell S V Elkind

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shadi YaghiFrom the Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (S.Y.); and Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY (M.S.V.E.).
Mitchell S V ElkindFrom the Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (S.Y.); and Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY (M.S.V.E.). mse13@columbia.edu.

Funding

SWIFT: Stroke Warning Information and Faster TreatmentP50NS049060 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MOHR, JAY P · 2004 to 2013
$18.2M
New York Stroke Trials Network of Columbia and Cornell (NYCCSTN)U10NS086728 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MARSHALL, RANDOLPH S · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS049060NINDS NIH HHS U10 NS086728NINDS NIH HHS U10NS086728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCerebral HemorrhageCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDyslipidemiasEzetimibeFibric AcidsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsLeukoencephalopathiesLipoprotein(a)Practice Guidelines as TopicPrimary PreventionSecondary PreventionStrokeCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeFibric AcidsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsLipoprotein(a)Triglyceridescerebral hemorrhagecholesterollipidslipoprotein(a)stroke

Identifiers

PMID26451029
PMCPMC4624572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.