Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26450693›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

PET/CT with (11)C-choline for evaluation of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence: meta-analysis and critical review of available data.

Stefano Fanti, Silvia Minozzi, Paolo Castellucci, Sara Balduzzi, Ken Herrmann, Bernd Joachim Krause, Wim Oyen, Arturo Chiti

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Highlights of articles published in annals of nuclear medicine 2016.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. [Focus on molecular imaging in prostate cancer].Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie
    Pooled it
  6. [Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. The Role of Nuclear Medicine in Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Head-to-Head Comparison of [Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefano FantiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, PAD 30, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. stefano.fanti@aosp.bo.it.
Silvia MinozziCochrane Review Group on Drugs and Alcohol, Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via di Santa Costanza, 53, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Paolo CastellucciDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, PAD 30, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Sara BalduzziDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine, Clinical and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Medical Plaza 200, Suite B114-61, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7370, USA.
Bernd Joachim KrauseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Wim OyenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Arturo ChitiNuclear Medicine, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via A. Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor the last decade PET and PET/CT with (11)C-choline have been proposed for the evaluation of prostate cancer (PC), but the diagnostic performance of (11)C-choline PET/CT is still a matter of debate. We performed a comprehensive review of the most important clinical application of (11)C-choline PET, restaging of patients with biochemical relapse, following a rigorous methodological approach and including assessment of the risk of bias. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature assessing (11)C-choline PET/CT for its accuracy in the diagnosis and ability to detect the site of recurrence of PC in the restaging of patients with biochemical recurrence after initial treatment with curative intent.

methodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library to determine the accuracy for the detection of the site of recurrence (prostate bed recurrences, metastatic spread to locoregional pelvic lymph nodes or distant metastases). Only studies with a reference standard (for prostatic bed histopathology, for histopathology or biopsy of distant metastases or a composite reference standard with clinical follow-up of at least 12 months, correlative imaging and clinical data) were included.

resultsOverall 425 studies were retrieved, of which 43 were judged as potentially relevant and 29 with 2,686 participants were finally included. Of these 29 studies, 18 reported results for any relapse, All 18 studies, with a total of 2,126 participants, reported detection rates. The pooled rate was 62 % (95 % CI 53 - 71 %). Of the 18 studies, 12 with 1,270 participants reported useful data to derive sensitivity and specificity. The pooled sensitivity was 89 % (95 % CI 83 - 93 %) and the pooled specificity was 89 % (95 % CI 73 - 96 %). Of 11 studies reporting results for local relapse, 9 with 993 participants reported detection rates. The pooled rate was 27 % (95 % CI 16 - 38 %). Six studies with 491 participants reported sensitivity and specificity. The pooled sensitivity was 61 % (95 % CI 40 - 80 %) and the pooled specificity was 97 % (95 % CI 87 - 99 %). Ten studies reported results for lymph nodes and distant metastases. For nodal disease, 7 studies with 752 participants reported detection rates. The pooled rate was 36 % (95 % CI 22 - 50 %). For bone metastases, 8 studies with 775 participants reported detection rates. The pooled rate was 25 % (95 % CI 16 - 34 %).

conclusionThere is a significant amount of (11)C-choline PET data published showing a high degree of consistency in inclusion criteria, acquisition protocols and scan interpretation criteria. Furthermore, the quality of the data derived limited to the same standard of reference was acceptable. Despite a high variability in the observed prevalence of any relapse, the diagnostic performance of (11)C-choline PET was in line with previous meta-analyses. Our data confirm the very good accuracy of (11)C-choline PET for detection of lymph node metastases and/or distant lesions in a single examination in patients with biochemical relapse.

Indexed as

Carbon RadioisotopesCholineHumansMalePositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsRecurrenceTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarbon RadioisotopesCholine11C-CholinePositron emission tomographyProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.