Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26450583›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2016

Needs and fears of young people presenting at accident and emergency department following an act of self-harm: secondary analysis of qualitative data.

Christabel Owens, Lorraine Hansford, Siobhan Sharkey, Tamsin Ford

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christabel OwensChristabel Owens, PhD, Lorraine Hansford, MSc, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK; Siobhan Sharkey, PhD, RMN, Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, UK; Tamsin Ford, PhD, MRCPsych, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK c.v.owens@exeter.ac.uk.
Lorraine HansfordChristabel Owens, PhD, Lorraine Hansford, MSc, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK; Siobhan Sharkey, PhD, RMN, Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, UK; Tamsin Ford, PhD, MRCPsych, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Siobhan SharkeyChristabel Owens, PhD, Lorraine Hansford, MSc, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK; Siobhan Sharkey, PhD, RMN, Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, UK; Tamsin Ford, PhD, MRCPsych, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Tamsin FordChristabel Owens, PhD, Lorraine Hansford, MSc, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK; Siobhan Sharkey, PhD, RMN, Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, UK; Tamsin Ford, PhD, MRCPsych, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RC-PG-0407-10098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPresentation at an accident and emergency (A&E) department is a key opportunity to engage with a young person who self-harms. The needs of this vulnerable group and their fears about presenting to healthcare services, including A&E, are poorly understood.

aimsTo examine young people's perceptions of A&E treatment following self-harm and their views on what constitutes a positive clinical encounter.

methodSecondary analysis of qualitative data from an experimental online discussion forum. Threads selected for secondary analysis represent the views of 31 young people aged 16-25 with experience of self-harm.

resultsParticipants reported avoiding A&E whenever possible, based on their own and others' previous poor experiences. When forced to seek emergency care, they did so with feelings of shame and unworthiness. These feelings were reinforced when they received what they perceived as punitive treatment from A&E staff, perpetuating a cycle of shame, avoidance and further self-harm. Positive encounters were those in which they received 'treatment as usual', i.e. non-discriminatory care, delivered with kindness, which had the potential to challenge negative self-evaluation and break the cycle.

conclusionsThe clinical needs of young people who self-harm continue to demand urgent attention. Further hypothesis testing and trials of different models of care delivery for this vulnerable group are warranted.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFearHelp-Seeking BehaviorShameAdolescentAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInternetMaleQualitative ResearchSelf-AssessmentSelf-Injurious BehaviorYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26450583
PMCPMC4807637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.