Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26450500›Full record

ReviewAdvances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology2015

Implantation and Establishment of Pregnancy in Human and Nonhuman Primates.

Ren-Wei Su, Asgerally T Fazleabas

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Implantation Failure: Where to Look Up?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Material properties of nonpregnant and pregnant human uterine layers.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Reliability of Rodent and Rabbit Models in Preeclampsia Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ren-Wei SuDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA. asgi@hc.msu.edu.
Asgerally T FazleabasDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Modulation of the Receptive Endometrium by CGR01HD042280 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FAZLEABAS, ASGERALLY T. · 2003 to 2020
$4.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantation and the establishment of pregnancy are critical for the propagation of the species, but yet remain the limiting steps in human and primate reproduction. Successful implantation requires a competent blastocyst and a receptive endometrium during a specific window of time during the menstrual cycle to initiate the bilateral communication required for the establishment of a successful pregnancy. This chapter provides an overview of these processes and discusses the molecular mechanisms associated with implantation of the blastocyst and decidualization of the uterus in primates.

Indexed as

Embryo ImplantationAnimalsDeciduaEndometriumFemaleHumansPregnancyPrimates

Identifiers

PMID26450500
PMCPMC5098399
OpenAlexW2268363063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.