ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015
[Quality of life, psychological distress, and social outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Results from a urology competence center for rehabilitation].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Work disability after robot-assisted or open radical prostatectomy].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017Article
- [Not Available].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality of life is an important parameter for quality assurance of the results. After radical prostatectomy, quality of life is often limited. The degree of urinary incontinence correlates significantly with quality of life.
resultsOncological and functional results are significantly decreased with the age of the patients. On the other hand, the psychological distress of younger patients is significantly greater than in the elderly. In the relative short period of 3-4 weeks of an inpatient rehabilitation in our urology competence center for rehabilitation, the mean decrease of urinary loss (24-h pad test) was 44.4 %. Psychological distress also decreased significantly as measured by the questionnaire on psychological distress FBK-R10 (p < 0.001).
conclusionsWith this, quality of life significantly increased in all function and symptom scales of the QLQ-C30. Thus, this makes reintegration into social life easier. The return to work rate of employed persons after our specific urological rehabilitation program following radical prostatectomy was 87 %.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.