Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26449988›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Tumour biology, metastatic sites and taxanes sensitivity as determinants of eribulin mesylate efficacy in breast cancer: results from the ERIBEX retrospective, international, multicenter study.

Mélodie Dell'Ova, Eléonora De Maio, Séverine Guiu, Lise Roca, Florence Dalenc, Anna Durigova, Frédéric Pinguet, Khedidja Bekhtari, William Jacot, Stéphane Pouderoux

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mélodie Dell'OvaDépartement de Pharmacie Clinique, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Melodie.DellOva@chu-fortdefrance.fr.
Eléonora De MaioMedical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT- Oncopole, Toulouse, France. DeMaio.Eleonora@iuct-oncopole.fr.
Séverine GuiuMedical Oncology Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France. sguiu@cgfl.fr.
Lise RocaDépartement de Biostatistiques, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Lise.Roca@icm.unicancer.fr.
Florence DalencMedical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT- Oncopole, Toulouse, France. dalenc.florence@iuct-oncopole.fr.
Anna DurigovaDépartement d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Anna.DurigovaAbdouh@hcuge.ch.
Frédéric PinguetDépartement de Pharmacie Clinique, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Frederic.Pinguet@icm.unicancer.fr.
Khedidja BekhtariDépartement de Pharmacie Clinique, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. khedidja.Bekhtari@icm.unicancer.fr.
William JacotDépartement d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. William.jacot@icm.unicancer.fr.
Stéphane PouderouxDépartement d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. stephane.pouderoux@icm.unicancer.fr.
Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur retrospective, international study aimed at evaluating the activity and safety of eribulin mesylate (EM) in pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a routine clinical setting.

methodsPatients treated with EM for a locally advanced or MBC between March 2011 and January 2014 were included in the study. Clinical and biological assessment of toxicity was performed at each visit. Tumour response was assessed every 3 cycles of treatment. A database was created to collect clinical, pathological and treatment data.

resultsTwo hundred and fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Median age was 59 years old. Tumours were Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive (73.3 %) HER2-positive (10.2 %), and triple negative (TN, 22.5 %). 86.4 % of the patients presented with visceral metastases, mainly in the liver (67.4 %). Median previous metastatic chemotherapies number was 4 [1-9]. Previous treatments included anthracyclines and/or taxanes (100 %) and capecitabine (90.7 %). Median number of EM cycles was 5 [1-19]. The relative dose intensity was 0.917. At the time of analysis (median follow-up of 13.9 months), 42.3 % of the patients were still alive. The objective response rate was 25.2 % (95 %CI: 20-31) with a 36.1 % clinical benefit rate (CBR). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were 3.97 (95 %CI: 3.25-4.3) and 11.2 (95 %CI: 9.3-12.1) months, respectively. One- and 2-year survival rates were 45.5 and 8.5 %, respectively. In multivariate analysis, HER2 positivity (HR = 0.29), the presence of lung metastases (HR = 2.49) and primary taxanes resistance (HR = 2.36) were the only three independent CBR predictive factors, while HR positivity (HR = 0.67), the presence of lung metastases (HR = 1.52) and primary taxanes resistance (HR = 1.50) were the only three TTP independent prognostic factors. Treatment was globally well tolerated. Most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (20.9 %), peripheral neuropathy (3.9 %), anaemia (1.6 %), liver dysfunction (0.8 %) and thrombocytopenia (0.4 %). Thirteen patients (5 %) developed febrile neutropenia.

conclusionEM is an effective new option in heavily pretreated MBC, with a favourable efficacy/safety ratio in a clinical practice setting. Our results comfort the use of this new molecule and pledge for the evaluation of EM-trastuzumab combination in this setting. Tumour biology, primary taxanes sensitivity and metastatic sites could represent useful predictive and prognostic factors.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFuransHumansKetonesMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPolyether PolyketidesPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumoreribulinFuransKetonesPolyether PolyketidesTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID26449988
PMCPMC4599752
OpenAlexW1904541254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.