Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26449553›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2016

Development of a patient decision aid prototype for adults with obstructive sleep apnea.

Logan Trenaman, Sarah Munro, Fernanda Almeida, Najib Ayas, James Hicklin, Nick Bansback

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Efficacy of a patient decision aid for improving person-centered decision-making by older adults with obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in adults.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Review
  8. Decision aid prototype development for parents considering adenotonsillectomy for their children with sleep disordered breathing.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Logan TrenamanSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. logantrenaman@gmail.com.
Sarah MunroSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Fernanda AlmeidaFaculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Najib AyasCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
James HicklinDepartment of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nick BansbackSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo describe the development and assess the usability of a patient decision aid (PtDA) prototype designed for newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients.

methodsA web-based PtDA was developed which focuses on two first-line treatment options: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and mandibular advancement splints (MAS). Development was guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Usability was assessed in individuals at high risk for OSA based on the STOP-Bang questionnaire, the patient acceptance of decision aid, the System Usability Scale (SUS), and content analysis of open-ended user feedback.

resultsEighty eligible participants completed the survey. The mean age was 54 years (SD = 8.9), 60 % of the sample was male, 78 % were university-educated, and 64 % were employed full-time. Participants took an average of 13.7 min (SD = 9.6) to complete the PtDA, with 39 participants choosing CPAP, 25 choosing MAS, and 16 choosing no treatment. The mean SUS score was 78.22 (SD = 15.13). The majority of individuals thought the PtDA was useful in making a decision (n = 77, 96 %) and would recommend it to others (n = 77, 96 %), while a third (n = 26, 33 %) thought it was slanted towards CPAP.

conclusionsThe SUS indicated that the PtDA was acceptable and useful for participants. And useful for participants. User feedback has been used to improve the prototype, which will now undergo further testing in patients at the Vancouver Sleep Disorders Clinic.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureDecision Support TechniquesInternetMandibular AdvancementAdultFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSleep Apnea, ObstructiveContinuous positive airway pressureMandibular advancement splintsObstructive sleep apneaPatient decision aid

Identifiers

PMID26449553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.