Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26449521›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2016

Recovery of visual functions in amblyopic animals following brief exposure to total darkness.

Donald E Mitchell, Katelyn MacNeill, Nathan A Crowder, Kaitlyn Holman, Kevin R Duffy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Refractive amblyopia among children aged 4-12 years in a hospital-based setting in Gaza Strip, Palestine.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Refractive adaptation and efficacy of occlusion therapy in untreated amblyopic patients aged 12 to 40 years.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Critical periods in amblyopia.Visual neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Rapid recovery from the effects of early monocular deprivation is enabled by temporary inactivation of the retinas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donald E MitchellDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Katelyn MacNeillDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Nathan A CrowderDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kaitlyn HolmanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kevin R DuffyDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CANova Scotia Hospital · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP102653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsOcclusion of one eye of kittens (monocular deprivation) results in a severe and permanent loss of visual acuity in that eye, which parallels closely the vision loss characteristic of human amblyopia. We extended earlier work to demonstrate that amblyopic vision loss can be either blocked or erased very fast by a 10 day period of total darkness following a period of monocular deprivation that begins near birth and extends to at least 8 weeks of age. The parameters of darkness were strict because no visual recovery was observed after 5 days of darkness. In addition, short periods of light introduced each day during an otherwise 10 day period of darkness obliterated the benefits. Despite recovery of normal visual acuity, only one-quarter of the animals showed evidence of having attained normal stereoscopic vision. A period of total darkness may catalyse and improve treatment outcomes in amblyopic children. A 10 day period of total darkness has been shown to either block or erase the severe effects on vision of a prior short period of monocular deprivation (MD) in kittens depending on whether darkness is contiguous or is delayed with respect to the period of MD. We have extended these earlier findings from kittens for which the period of MD began at 1 month and lasted for 1 week to more clinically relevant situations where MD began near birth and lasted for ≥ 6 weeks. Despite the far longer MD and the absence of prior binocular vision, all animals recovered normal visual acuity in the previously deprived eye. As before, when the period of darkness followed immediately after MD, the vision of both eyes was initially very poor but, subsequently, the acuity of each eye increased gradually and equally to attain normal levels in ∼ 7 weeks. By contrast, when darkness was introduced 8 weeks after MD, the visual acuity of the deprived eye recovered quickly to normal levels in just 1 week without any change in the vision of the fellow (non-deprived) eye. Short (15 or 30 min) periods of illumination each day during an otherwise 10 day period of darkness obliterated all the benefits for vision, and a 5 day period of darkness was also completely ineffective. Measurements of depth perception indicated that, despite possessing normal visual acuity in both eyes, only about one-quarter of the animals showed evidence of having attained normal stereoscopic vision.

Indexed as

DarknessRecovery of FunctionVisual AcuityAmblyopiaAnimalsCatsDepth PerceptionFemaleMaleVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID26449521
PMCPMC4704512
OpenAlexW1943051336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.