Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26449417›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2016

Molecular characterization and expression analysis of SERK1 and SERK2 in Brassica napus L.: implication for microspore embryogenesis and plant regeneration.

Behzad Ahmadi, Farhad Masoomi-Aladizgeh, Mehran E Shariatpanahi, Pejman Azadi, Mehdi Keshavarz-Alizadeh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  2. Effects of genotype and culture conditions on microspore embryogenesis in radish (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Article
  3. Cloning and expression analysis ofOpen life sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Soybean Hypocotyls PreventFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Expression and DNA methylation ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Behzad AhmadiDepartment of Tissue Culture and Gene Transformation, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), AREEO, 3135933151, Karaj, Iran.
Farhad Masoomi-AladizgehDepartment of Tissue Culture and Gene Transformation, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), AREEO, 3135933151, Karaj, Iran.
Mehran E ShariatpanahiDepartment of Tissue Culture and Gene Transformation, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), AREEO, 3135933151, Karaj, Iran. mehran.shariatpanahi@abrii.ac.ir.
Pejman AzadiDepartment of Tissue Culture and Gene Transformation, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), AREEO, 3135933151, Karaj, Iran.
Mehdi Keshavarz-AlizadehDepartment of Tissue Culture and Gene Transformation, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), AREEO, 3135933151, Karaj, Iran.
Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran · IRAgricultural Research & Education Organization · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageThe BnSERK1 and BnSERK2 are involved in the process of microspore embryogenesis induction, development, and plantlet regeneration. Little is known about regulatory role of somatic embryogenesis-related kinase (SERK) genes family in the induction of microspore embryogenesis, development and plant regeneration. In this study, the expression of two SERK genes (SERK1 and SERK2) was assessed during the microspore embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in Brassica napus L. The BnSERK1 was severely up-regulated 1-5 days following microspore culture and its expression drastically decreased in the globular-heart and also torpedo staged microspore-derived embryos (MDEs). In addition, high levels of BnSERK1 transcript were detected in the MDE maturation phase and in the roots and shoots of the regenerated plantlets which indicates a broader role(s) of BnSERK1 in the organ formation, rather than being specific to the embryogenesis. Results of partial sequencing indicated that the BnSERK1 shares a conserved serine-threonine kinase catalytic domain and exhibited 95 % similarity with AtSERK1, CsSERK1, BrSERK1, NaSERK1, and NbSERK1. A steady increase in the expression of BnSERK2 was observed during the MDE initiation and development so that, the highest expression was noted in the MDE maturation phase i.e., late cotyledonary MDEs. Our results also indicated low amounts of BnSERK2 transcript at the onset of rhyzogenesis but significantly higher expression in the developing roots. In contrast, the BnSERK2 strongly up-regulated during the both initially and developed shoots. The BnSERK2 shares highly conserved LRR-RLK domain when compared with different species tested so that, high homology (100 %) was noticed with BrSERK2. Based on our findings, MDE formation and plantlet regeneration seem to be correlated with both BnSERK1 and BnSERK2 expression.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant Somatic Embryogenesis TechniquesBrassica napusCatalytic DomainGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalPlant ProteinsPollenProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRegenerationUp-RegulationPlant ProteinsProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSERK protein, plantBrassica napus L.DAPIMicrospore embryogenesisqRT-PCRSERK

Identifiers

PMID26449417
OpenAlexW1949241668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.