Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26449391›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016

Single-dose fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double-blind phase III trial.

C Weinstein, K Jordan, S A Green, E Camacho, S Khanani, E Beckford-Brathwaite, W Vallejos, L W Liang, S J Noga, B L Rapoport

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01594749 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Parallel-Group Study, Conducted Under In-House Blinding Conditions, to Examine the Efficacy and Safety of a Single 150 mg Dose of Intravenous Fosaprepitant Dimeglumine for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) Associated With Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2012 to 2014Enrolled1,015ConditionsChemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV)ArmsFosaprepitant dimeglumine, Fosaprepitant Placebo, Dexamethasone, Ondansetron, Dexamethasone Placebo
NCT04873284 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study of Fosaprepitant and Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Cancer Patients:A Superiority Design, Phase III Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Children's Medical CenterRan2021 to 2021Enrolled120ConditionsChemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting, Pediatric Cancer PatientsArmsfosaprepitant, aprepitant, Granisetron plus dexamethasone
NCT05230654 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Fosaprepitant in Preventing Chemotherapy-induced Vomiting in Children Treated With Medium and High Emetic Chemotherapeutic Drugs

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Children's Medical CenterRan2022 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsChemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting Pediatric Cancer PatientsArmsFosaprepitant, Placebo(normal saline)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Is the addition of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist beneficial in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Global inequitable distribution of seminal studies of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

C WeinsteinMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA cindy.l.weinstein@merck.com.
K JordanDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
S A GreenMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
E CamachoDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, CA.
S KhananiDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA.
E Beckford-BrathwaiteMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
W VallejosMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
L W LiangMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
S J NogaDepartment of Oncology, Weinberg Cancer Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
B L RapoportDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology Center of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USDesert Regional Medical Center · USMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEReliant Medical Group · USThe Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo establish the role of antiemetic therapy with neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists (RAs) in nonanthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC)-based moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens, this study evaluated single-dose intravenous (i.v.) fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with non-AC MEC. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this international, phase III, double-blind trial, adult cancer subjects scheduled to receive ≥1 non-AC MEC on day 1 were randomized to a regimen comprising single-dose i.v. fosaprepitant 150 mg or placebo along with ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; control regimen recipients received ondansetron on days 2 and 3. Primary end points were the proportion of subjects achieving a complete response (CR; no vomiting and no use of rescue medication) in the delayed phase (25-120 h after MEC initiation) and safety. Secondary end points included CR in the overall and acute phases (0-120 and 0-24 h after MEC initiation, respectively) and no vomiting in the overall phase. Nausea and the Functional Living Index-Emesis were assessed as exploratory end points.

resultsThe fosaprepitant regimen improved CR significantly in the delayed (78.9% versus 68.5%; P < 0.001) and overall (77.1% versus 66.9%; P < 0.001) phases, but not in the acute phase (93.2% versus 91.0%; P = 0.184), versus control. In the overall phase, the proportion of subjects with no vomiting (82.7% versus 72.9%; P < 0.001) and no significant nausea (83.2% versus 77.9%; P = 0.030) was also significantly improved with the fosaprepitant regimen. The fosaprepitant regimen was generally well tolerated.

conclusionSingle-dose fosaprepitant added to a 5-HT3 RA and dexamethasone was well tolerated and demonstrated superior control of CINV (primary end point achieved) associated with non-AC MEC. This is the first study to evaluate NK1 RA therapy as an i.v. formulation in a well-defined non-AC MEC population. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01594749 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01594749).

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMorpholinesNauseaTreatment OutcomeVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsfosaprepitantMorpholinesfosaprepitant dimegluminemoderately emetogenic chemotherapynauseaneurokinin-1 receptor antagonistsvomiting

Identifiers

PMID26449391
PMCPMC4684151
OpenAlexW2202540117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.