Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26449178›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2015

Sizing up the key determinants of the CD8(+) T cell response.

David C Tscharke, Nathan P Croft, Peter C Doherty, Nicole L La Gruta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David C TscharkeJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia.
Nathan P CroftDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3141, Australia.
Peter C DohertyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Nicole L La GrutaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naive CD8(+) T cells give rise to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), which promote the effective eradication of viruses and tumours. Although the past decades have seen enormous advances in cellular immunology, a precise understanding of the key elements that determine the specificity and magnitude of primary CTL responses has been lacking. However, recent technological advances have allowed us to more accurately identify, characterize and quantitate key determinants that define the specificity and magnitude of CD8(+) T cell-mediated immunity. This Review discusses the technical and conceptual advances that have markedly changed our understanding of the determinants of primary CTL responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell MovementHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansImmunologic MemoryReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID26449178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.