Observational studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology2015
Implications of Coronary Artery Calcium Testing Among Statin Candidates According to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Management Guidelines: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).
Observational study in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 197 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
197 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 463 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updated Cardiovascular Prevention Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology - 2019.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2019Guideline
- 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019Guideline
- 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation · 2019 · on this mapGuideline
- 2018 Cholesterol Guidelines: Key Topics in Primary Prevention.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2019Guideline
- Pooled it
- Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease by Coronary CT Angiography Improves Risk Stratification and Allocation of Statin Therapy.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2017Pooled it
- The Identification of Calcified Coronary Plaque Is Associated With Initiation and Continuation of Pharmacological and Lifestyle Preventive Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2017Pooled it
- Guideline
- Statin use and outcome risks according to predicted CVD risk in Korea: A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Effect of icosapent ethyl on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with elevated triglycerides on statin therapy: final results of the EVAPORATE trial.European heart journal · 2020Trial
- Agatston-2.0: A next-generation AI-based coronary calcium quantification approach to improve risk stratification among individuals with zero Agatston scores - Part I: An AI-CVD Study within the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Framingham Heart Study.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Real-world impact of coronary artery calcium scoring on primary prevention management in a community cardiology practice.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- PREVENT vs PCE thresholds for coronary artery calcium referral: Detection-optimized strategies in ELSA-Brasil.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Integrating Conventional and Emerging Approaches in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Coronary artery calcium scoring: expanding the new standard by photon-counting detector CT-Part I: Impact of tube voltage, tube current, slice thickness, and quantum iterative reconstructions.European radiology · 2026Article
- Coronary artery calcium score of zero in individuals with diabetes: association with normal coronary arteries and cardiovascular risk factors.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- The coming age of coronary atherosclerosis-guided cardiovascular risk prediction and management.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Risk stratification using coronary artery calcium and potential benefit of semaglutide therapy: A cost-effectiveness modelling study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Addition of CAD polygenic risk score to coronary artery calcium score enhances prediction of MACE.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular imaging for the detection of asymptomatic coronary artery disease: an updated systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedMiemdema, Michael D [corrected to Miedema, Michael D]
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) cholesterol management guidelines have significantly broadened the scope of candidates eligible for statin therapy.
objectivesThis study evaluated the implications of the absence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in reclassifying patients from a risk stratum in which statins are recommended to one in which they are not.
methodsMESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) is a longitudinal study of 6,814 men and women 45 to 84 years of age without clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk at enrollment. We excluded 1,100 participants (16%) on lipid-lowering medication, 87 (1.3%) without low-density lipoprotein levels, 26 (0.4%) with missing risk factors for calculation of 10-year risk of ASCVD, 633 (9%) >75 years of age, and 209 (3%) with low-density lipoprotein <70 mg/dl from the analysis.
resultsThe study population consisted of 4,758 participants (age 59 ± 9 years; 47% males). A total of 247 (5.2%) ASCVD and 155 (3.3%) hard coronary heart disease events occurred over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 10.3 (9.7 to 10.8) years. The new ACC/AHA guidelines recommended 2,377 (50%) MESA participants for moderate- to high-intensity statins; the majority (77%) was eligible because of a 10-year estimated ASCVD risk ≥7.5%. Of those recommended statins, 41% had CAC = 0 and had 5.2 ASCVD events/1,000 person-years. Among 589 participants (12%) considered for moderate-intensity statin, 338 (57%) had a CAC = 0, with an ASCVD event rate of 1.5 per 1,000 person-years. Of participants eligible (recommended or considered) for statins, 44% (1,316 of 2,966) had CAC = 0 at baseline and an observed 10-year ASCVD event rate of 4.2 per 1,000 person-years.
conclusionsSignificant ASCVD risk heterogeneity exists among those eligible for statins according to the new guidelines. The absence of CAC reclassifies approximately one-half of candidates as not eligible for statin therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.