Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26448946›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Collagen Type XI Alpha 1 Expression in Intraductal Papillomas Predicts Malignant Recurrence.

Javier Freire, Lucia García-Berbel, Pilar García-Berbel, Saray Pereda, Ainara Azueta, Pilar García-Arranz, Ana De Juan, Alfonso Vega, Ángela Hens, Ana Enguita and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Collagen XI alpha 1 chain, a potential therapeutic target for cancer.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Review
  4. Collagen (XI) alpha-1 chain is an independent prognostic factor in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Javier FreireAnatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain ; IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain.
Lucia García-BerbelGinecología y Obstetricia, Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.
Pilar García-BerbelAnatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain ; IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain.
Saray PeredaAnatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain ; IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain.
Ainara AzuetaAnatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain ; IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain.
Pilar García-ArranzAnatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
Ana De JuanOncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
Alfonso VegaRadiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
Ángela HensAnatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.
Ana EnguitaAnatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Muñoz-CachoGerencia Atención Primaria, Servicio Cántabro de Salud, 39011 Santander, Spain.
Javier Gómez-RománAnatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain ; IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESHospital Universitario Puerto Real · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESServicio Cántabro de Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the progress achieved in the treatment of breast cancer, there are still many unsolved clinical issues, being the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of papillary diseases, one of the highest challenges. Because of its unpredictable clinical behavior, treatment of intraductal papilloma has generated a great controversy. Even though considered as a benign lesion, it presents high rate of malignant recurrence. This is the reason why there are clinicians supporting a complete excision of the lesion, while others support an only expectant follow-up. Previous results of our group suggested that procollagen 11 alpha 1 (pro-COL11A1) expression correlates with infiltrating phenotype in breast lesions. We analyzed the correlation between expression of pro-COL11A1 in intraductal papilloma and their risk of malignant recurrence. Immunohistochemistry of pro-COL11A1 was performed in 62 samples of intraductal papilloma. Ten out 11 cases relapsed as carcinoma presents positive staining for COL11A1, while just 17 out of 51 cases with benign behaviour present immunostaining. There were significant differences (P < 0.0001) when comparing patients with malignant recurrence versus nonmalignant relapse patients. These data suggest that pro-COL11A1 expression is a highly sensitive biomarker to predict malignant relapse of intraductal papilloma and it can be used as indicative factor for prevention programs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCollagen Type XIFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPapilloma, IntraductalPrevalencePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityCollagen Type XI

Identifiers

PMID26448946
PMCPMC4584034
OpenAlexW2109399270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.