ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2015
Laparoscopic resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Updates in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Current Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020Pooled it
- Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Review
- Laparoscopic Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Type IIIb: A Video Demonstration of No-Touch En-Block Technique and Radical Lymphadenectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Short- and Long-Term Results.Cancers · 2023Review
- Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma-A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Review
- Robotic Resection of a Type IIIB Klatskin Tumor.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021Article
- Complete laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: technical aspects and long-term results from a single center.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021Article
- Total laparoscopic versus open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Advanced laparoscopic HPB surgery: Experience in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2020Review
- Application of Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Type III and IV Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Treatment.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Article
- Can we delineate preoperatively the right and ventral margins of caudate lobe of the liver?Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2019Article
- Pure laparoscopic radical resection for type IIIa hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Single incision laparoscopic liver resection (SILL) - a systematic review.GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2015Review
- Minimally Invasive Approaches for Surgical Management of Primary Liver Cancers.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is technically challenging because it involves complicated laparoscopic procedures that include laparoscopic hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy, hemihepatectomy with caudate lobectomy, and hepaticojejunostomy. There are currently very few reports describing this type of surgery. Between August 2014 and December 2014, 5 patients underwent total laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Two patients with type I or II hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent radical hilar resection. Three patients with type IIIa or IIIb cholangiocarcinoma underwent extended hemihepatectomy together with caudate lobectomy. The median (range) age, operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 63 years (43-76 years), 610 minutes (410-665 minutes), 650 mL (450-1,300 mL), and 12 days (9-21 days), respectively. Four patients had a negative margin, but 1 patient was diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia on the proximal resection margin. The median tumor size was 3.0 cm. One patient experienced postoperative biliary leakage, which resolved spontaneously. Laparoscopic resection is a feasible surgical approach in selected patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.